chore: add search type to query manager #4912
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new optional field Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src/proto/src/generated/cluster.rsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/config/src/meta/search.rs (1 hunks)
- src/proto/proto/cluster/search.proto (1 hunks)
- src/service/search/mod.rs (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/config/src/meta/search.rs (1)
Pattern
**/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestionsMake sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.
src/service/search/mod.rs (1)
Pattern
**/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestionsMake sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/proto/proto/cluster/search.proto (2)
84-84: LGTM! Follows protobuf best practices.The addition of
optional string search_typefield is well-structured:
- Properly numbered field (11)
- Marked as optional for backward compatibility
- Consistent naming convention
84-84: Verify consistent field naming across codebase.Let's ensure the field naming is consistent between proto definitions and their usage.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Field naming is consistent across the codebase
The
search_typefield is consistently used throughout the codebase:
- Proto definition uses
search_type(string)- Rust structs consistently use
search_typefield name- All usages in services and handlers maintain the same naming
- The field maps to a well-defined
SearchEventTypeenum insrc/config/src/meta/search.rs🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent naming of search_type field across the codebase # Expected: Should find matching field names in related Rust structs and proto definitions # Search for search_type field declarations and usages rg -g '!*.proto' 'search_type' # Search for related SearchEventType enum or type definitions rg 'SearchEventType'Length of output: 13538
src/config/src/meta/search.rs (1)
559-559: LGTM! The new field is properly implemented.The addition of the optional
search_typefield toQueryStatusstruct follows Rust best practices:
- Uses
Optionfor optional field- Implements all necessary traits (Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize, ToSchema)
- Maintains backward compatibility
src/service/search/mod.rs (4)
384-386: Extraction ofs_event_typeis correctly implementedThe code correctly maps
in_req.search_typetos_event_typeas anOption<String>.
400-400: Passings_event_typetoTaskStatus::new_leaderThe addition of
s_event_typeparameter enhances tracking of search events.
702-702: ImportingFromStris appropriateImporting
std::str::FromStris necessary for parsingSearchEventTypefrom strings.
852-852: Includingsearch_typeinQueryStatusAdding the
search_typefield tosearch::QueryStatusimproves the comprehensiveness of the status information.
| let search_type: Option<search::SearchEventType> = result | ||
| .search_type | ||
| .map(|s_event_type| search::SearchEventType::from_str(&s_event_type).unwrap()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential parsing errors without using .unwrap()
Using .unwrap() on search::SearchEventType::from_str() can cause a panic if the string cannot be parsed. Consider handling the parsing error gracefully to prevent potential panics.
Suggested change:
let search_type: Option<search::SearchEventType> = result
.search_type
- .map(|s_event_type| search::SearchEventType::from_str(&s_event_type).unwrap());
+ .and_then(|s_event_type| search::SearchEventType::from_str(&s_event_type).ok());📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let search_type: Option<search::SearchEventType> = result | |
| .search_type | |
| .map(|s_event_type| search::SearchEventType::from_str(&s_event_type).unwrap()); | |
| let search_type: Option<search::SearchEventType> = result | |
| .search_type | |
| .and_then(|s_event_type| search::SearchEventType::from_str(&s_event_type).ok()); |
oasisk
force-pushed
the
chore-add-search-type-to-query-manager
branch
from
12469a7 to
98ba54c
Compare
oasisk
force-pushed
the
chore-add-search-type-to-query-manager
branch
from
98ba54c to
7fa078a
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
search_typefield in the QueryStatus, allowing for more detailed tracking of search events.Improvements
These changes aim to provide users with richer metadata and improved search capabilities.