Skip to content

Conversation

@hengfeiyang
Copy link
Contributor

@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang commented Oct 16, 2024

Reduce disk_lock for delay deletion job.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Increased the default batch size for processing jobs from 100 to 500, enhancing the efficiency of compacting operations.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified the compaction process by removing unnecessary locking mechanisms, improving performance and reliability.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined data retention and compaction functions for better clarity and efficiency.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the default value of the batch_size field in the Compact struct from 100 to 500 in the configuration settings. Additionally, it simplifies the control flow in the src/service/compact/mod.rs file by removing distributed locking mechanisms and streamlining functions related to data retention and compaction processes. The changes focus on improving efficiency and clarity in the management of compaction tasks without altering the core logic of related functions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/config/src/config.rs Updated default value of batch_size in Compact struct from 100 to 500.
src/service/compact/mod.rs Removed dist_lock import and locking logic; simplified run_delay_deletion, run_retention, run_generate_job, and run_merge functions to focus on current node operations without locking.

Possibly related PRs

  • refactor: compactor working with job queue #3761: This PR adds new fields to the Compact struct in src/config/src/config.rs, including a batch_size field, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that modifies the default value of the batch_size field in the same struct.
  • fix: consistent hashing #4517: This PR modifies the run_generate_job and run_merge functions in src/service/compact/mod.rs, which are also mentioned in the main PR's changes to src/service/compact/mod.rs, indicating a connection in the context of compaction operations.

Suggested labels

☢️ Bug, 🧹 Updates

Suggested reviewers

  • haohuaijin
  • oasisk
  • Subhra264

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added ☢️ Bug Something isn't working 🧹 Updates labels Oct 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/service/compact/mod.rs (1)

Line range hint 204-220: Fix premature termination of background task due to dropped sender

The background task responsible for periodically updating job statuses may terminate immediately because the _tx sender is dropped shortly after creation. Since _tx is not kept alive, rx.recv() returns None immediately, causing the task to exit before performing any updates.

To fix this issue, retain the _tx sender in the outer scope to ensure it remains alive for the duration of the background task. Here is a suggested fix:

 let job_ids = jobs.iter().map(|job| job.id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
-let (_tx, mut rx) = mpsc::channel::<()>(1);
+let (_tx, mut rx) = mpsc::channel::<()>(1);
+let _tx_handle = _tx.clone(); // Keep a handle to the sender to prevent it from being dropped
 tokio::task::spawn(async move {
     loop {
         tokio::select! {
             _ = tokio::time::sleep(tokio::time::Duration::from_secs(ttl)) => {}
             _ = rx.recv() => {
                 log::debug!("[COMPACT] update_running_jobs done");
                 return;
             }
         }
         for id in job_ids.iter() {
             if let Err(e) = infra_file_list::update_running_jobs(*id).await {
                 log::error!("[COMPACT] update_job_status failed: {}", e);
             }
         }
     }
 });
+// Retain _tx_handle until the end of the function
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a71ecd and eb208a3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/config/src/config.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/service/compact/mod.rs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/config/src/config.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

src/service/compact/mod.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/config/src/config.rs (3)

Line range hint 1190-1194: Note: Existing safeguard for minimum batch size

While not changed in this PR, it's worth noting that the check_common_config function ensures a minimum value for batch_size:

if cfg.compact.batch_size < 1 {
    cfg.compact.batch_size = 100;
}

This safeguard prevents setting an invalid batch size. With the recent change to increase the default to 500, this check becomes less likely to be triggered but remains an important safety net.


Line range hint 1-1394: Summary: Configuration change to improve compaction performance

This PR makes a targeted change to the Compact struct by increasing the default batch_size from 100 to 500. This modification aims to improve the efficiency of the delay deletion process by allowing more pending jobs to be processed in a single batch during compaction operations.

Key points:

  1. The change is minimal and focused, affecting only one configuration parameter.
  2. Existing configuration checks and safeguards remain in place, ensuring the new default value is properly handled.
  3. The increased batch size has the potential to improve performance but should be monitored for any unintended consequences on memory usage or system responsiveness.

Overall, this change appears to be a reasonable optimization attempt. However, it's recommended to conduct thorough testing and monitoring in various scenarios to ensure it delivers the expected performance improvements without negative side effects.


1037-1037: Approved: Increased batch size for compact operations

The change from 100 to 500 for the batch_size field in the Compact struct looks good. This increase should improve the efficiency of the compacting operation by processing more pending jobs in a single batch.

To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact system performance, please monitor the following after deployment:

  1. Memory usage during compaction operations
  2. Overall system responsiveness
  3. Time taken for compaction operations to complete

You can use the following command to check for any logging or metrics related to compaction performance:

This will help identify any potential issues or confirm the positive impact of this change.

✅ Verification successful

Verified: batch_size default value updated to 500

The change from 100 to 500 for the batch_size field in the Compact struct has been successfully verified. This adjustment should enhance the efficiency of compacting operations by processing more jobs per batch.

No removed or replaced code related to this change was detected.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

rg -i 'compact|batch_size' --type rust

Length of output: 43273


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all assignments to 'batch_size' in Rust files
rg -i 'batch_size\s*=' --type rust

Length of output: 685


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all instances of 'batch_size' in Rust files, excluding those within strings
rg -i 'batch_size' --type rust | grep -v '"'

Length of output: 1920

src/service/compact/mod.rs (2)

Line range hint 64-71: Simplify node assignment logic using consistent hashing

Replacing the distributed locking mechanism with get_node_from_consistent_hash simplifies the code and enhances performance by reducing overhead when determining the compactor node for each stream. This change improves maintainability.


375-381: Ensure consistent node assignment in delay deletion

Using get_node_from_consistent_hash for determining the compactor node in the delay deletion process aligns with the approach used in other functions. This provides consistency and reduces the complexity associated with distributed locks.

@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang merged commit dbcbd80 into main Oct 16, 2024
@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang deleted the perf/compactor branch October 16, 2024 03:27
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2024
5 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

☢️ Bug Something isn't working 🧹 Updates

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants