Skip to content

fix: search partition loop #4591

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
hengfeiyang merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

fix: search partition loop #4591

hengfeiyang merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

@hengfeiyang
Copy link
Contributor

@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang commented Sep 19, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced performance logging for file list retrieval, enhancing traceability.
    • Improved the logic for calculating the step variable, ensuring it adheres to minimum constraints.

  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced robustness of partitioning logic to prevent scenarios with an excessively small step.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes to the search_partition function focus on enhancing performance logging and refining the calculation of the step variable. A timing mechanism has been added to log the duration of file list retrieval, capturing both the start time and elapsed time for traceability. Additionally, the logic for determining the step variable has been improved to ensure it is a multiple of min_step and enforces a minimum value, preventing it from being set too low. These updates aim to improve performance monitoring and the correctness of the partitioning logic.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/service/search/mod.rs Introduced performance logging for file list retrieval, including timing and metadata. Refined step variable logic to ensure it is a multiple of min_step and enforces a minimum value.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant SearchService
    participant FileList

    User->>SearchService: Request file list
    SearchService->>FileList: Start timing
    SearchService->>FileList: Retrieve file list
    FileList-->>SearchService: Return file list
    SearchService->>SearchService: Calculate elapsed time
    SearchService->>SearchService: Log timing and metadata
    SearchService->>User: Return file list
Loading
Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fcb7b92 and fe13ff8.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/service/search/mod.rs (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
src/service/search/mod.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

Additional comments not posted (2)
src/service/search/mod.rs (2)

240-241: Approve the addition of performance logging.

The changes introduce valuable performance logging to measure the duration of file list retrieval. This will provide insights for monitoring and optimization.

Also applies to: 269-275

346-351: Approve the refinement of the step calculation logic.

The updated logic ensures that the calculated step is a multiple of min_step and has a minimum value of min_step. This improves the robustness of the partitioning by adhering to the min_step constraint.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ☢️ Bug Something isn't working label Sep 19, 2024
@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang merged commit 00b9767 into main Sep 19, 2024
@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang deleted the fix/search_partition branch September 19, 2024 08:11
This was referenced Sep 20, 2024
Merged
Closed
This was referenced Oct 1, 2024
Merged
Closed
Merged
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2024
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2024
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Subhra264 Subhra264 Subhra264 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

☢️ Bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hengfeiyang @Subhra264