Skip to content

Conversation

@haohuaijin
Copy link
Collaborator

@haohuaijin haohuaijin commented Jul 8, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated Rust toolchain setup in .github/workflows/unit-tests.yml and rust-toolchain.toml.
  • Dependencies

    • Updated serde version in Cargo.toml.
    • Updated gxhash version specification in src/config/Cargo.toml.
  • Internal Improvements

    • Enhanced context creation and data fusion preparation for improved performance and flexibility.
    • Improved file group splitting logic based on CPU configurations for optimized resource usage.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Walkthrough

This update involves significant changes, primarily focused on modifying function signatures to incorporate additional parameters, such as sorting options, and refactoring import statements for clarity. Notable updates include a revised handling of file group splitting based on CPU configuration and adjustments to DataFusion context preparation. Changes also extend to dependency upgrades, specifically in serde and gxhash, as well as updates in Rust toolchain versions.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/.../grpc/storage.rs, src/.../grpc/wal.rs Added parameters to create_context and prepare_datafusion_context function calls.
src/.../exec.rs Added sort_by_timestamp_desc parameter to prepare_datafusion_context and modified related functions. Adjusted register_table function to use sort_key.
src/.../request/search/mod.rs, src/.../multi_streams.rs Reformatted import statements related to HTTP request handling functions.
src/.../table_provider/mod.rs Updated file group splitting logic based on CPU configuration. Added new functions repartition_sorted_groups and find_max_group_index.
.github/.../unit-tests.yml, rust-toolchain.toml Changed Rust toolchain version from nightly-2024-07-08 to nightly-2024-03-02.
Cargo.toml, src/config/Cargo.toml Updated version specifications for serde and gxhash dependencies.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4bff0be and 722293d.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/service/promql/search/grpc/storage.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/service/promql/search/grpc/wal.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs (10 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/service/promql/search/grpc/storage.rs
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
src/service/promql/search/grpc/wal.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

Additional comments not posted (5)
src/service/promql/search/grpc/wal.rs (1)

190-191: LGTM! The function call update is correct.

The addition of the empty array &[] as an argument in the register_table function call is appropriate.

src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs (4)

118-118: LGTM! The function call update is correct.

The addition of the &sql.meta.order_by parameter in the register_table function call is appropriate.


1217-1218: LGTM! The function signature update is correct.

The addition of the sort_by_timestamp_desc parameter in the prepare_datafusion_context function signature is appropriate.


1125-1128: LGTM! The function signature update is correct.

The addition of the sort_by_timestamp_desc parameter in the create_session_config function signature is appropriate.


1268-1274: LGTM! The function signature update is correct.

The addition of the sort_key parameter in the register_table function signature is appropriate.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 722293d and ec58083.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/handler/http/request/search/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/handler/http/request/search/multi_streams.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs (10 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • src/handler/http/request/search/mod.rs
  • src/handler/http/request/search/multi_streams.rs
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

Additional comments not posted (4)
src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs (4)

Line range hint 1125-1142:
LGTM! Changes align with the PR objective.

The changes to include the sort_by_timestamp_desc parameter and conditionally disable repartition and batch coalescing look good.


1218-1220: LGTM! Changes align with the PR objective.

The changes to include the sort_by_timestamp_desc parameter and pass it to create_session_config look good.


1269-1280: LGTM! Changes align with the PR objective.

The changes to include the sort_key parameter and determine if sorting by timestamp in descending order is needed look good.


122-127: LGTM! But verify the new parameter usage.

The change to include the sort_by_timestamp_desc parameter in the prepare_datafusion_context function call looks good.

However, ensure that all function calls to prepare_datafusion_context in the codebase match the new signature.

Verification successful

To ensure all calls to prepare_datafusion_context match the new signature, let's extract the relevant lines from the mentioned files and verify their correctness.


All calls to prepare_datafusion_context match the new signature.

The sort_by_timestamp_desc parameter has been correctly integrated into all relevant function calls.

  • src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs
  • src/service/promql/search/grpc/wal.rs
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `prepare_datafusion_context` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type rust $'prepare_datafusion_context'

Length of output: 934


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract lines with `prepare_datafusion_context` function definition and calls to verify the new signature.

# Extract function definition and calls in `src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs`
rg --type rust --context 5 'prepare_datafusion_context' src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs

# Extract function definition and calls in `src/service/promql/search/grpc/wal.rs`
rg --type rust --context 5 'prepare_datafusion_context' src/service/promql/search/grpc/wal.rs

Length of output: 3452

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec58083 and a579edc.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/service/search/datafusion/table_provider/mod.rs (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
src/service/search/datafusion/table_provider/mod.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

Additional comments not posted (4)
src/service/search/datafusion/table_provider/mod.rs (4)

37-37: Import statement is necessary for new functionality.

The get_config import is required for retrieving CPU configuration in the newly added logic.


252-264: New logic for splitting file groups based on CPU number is appropriate.

The logic aligns with the PR objective of improving performance by optimizing partitioning based on available CPU resources.


342-381: Function split_groups_by_cpu_num effectively splits file groups based on CPU number.

The function uses a straightforward even-odd strategy to split larger groups into smaller ones until the desired number of partitions is achieved.


383-394: Function find_max_group_index correctly identifies the group with the most files.

The function is a necessary helper for split_groups_by_cpu_num to determine which group to split next.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a579edc and ec3628b.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/service/search/datafusion/table_provider/mod.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/service/search/datafusion/table_provider/mod.rs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec3628b and 28eab0b.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs (10 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 28eab0b and 270e03d.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/unit-tests.yml (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • rust-toolchain.toml (1 hunks)
  • src/config/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs (10 hunks)
  • src/service/search/datafusion/table_provider/mod.rs (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • .github/workflows/unit-tests.yml
  • Cargo.toml
  • rust-toolchain.toml
  • src/config/Cargo.toml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs
  • src/service/search/datafusion/table_provider/mod.rs

@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang merged commit 5572cb3 into main Jul 8, 2024
@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang deleted the config_change branch July 8, 2024 11:05
hengfeiyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants