Skip to content

Conversation

@hengfeiyang
Copy link
Contributor

@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang commented Jun 4, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced memory mode settings (strict_memory_mode and less_memory_mode) for more efficient data processing and enhanced performance control.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted lock ID calculations in the PostgreSQL database to prevent overflow issues, ensuring stability and reliability.
  • Performance Improvements

    • Enhanced data merging processes to handle memory more effectively, optimizing resource usage and speed.

@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang requested a review from oasisk June 4, 2024 07:15
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates introduce memory management enhancements and adjustments to function signatures across several files. Key changes include adding parameters to control memory modes in batch concatenation and file merging functions, improving concurrency handling in the writer implementation, and refining lock ID calculations in the Postgres database implementation.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/config/src/utils/record_batch_ext.rs Added strict_memory_mode and less_memory_mode parameters to concat_batches to conditionally handle array concatenation based on memory mode settings.
src/job/files/parquet.rs Modified merge_files to include an additional boolean parameter in the merge_parquet_files function call when stream_type is StreamType::Logs.
src/service/compact/merge.rs Updated merge_files to include strict_memory_mode parameter in merge_parquet_files call, affecting logic flow. Added new functions merge_parquet_files_v1 and merge_parquet_files_v2.
src/ingester/src/writer.rs Changed Writer implementation to switch from reading to writing the memtable using the write method, which is now awaited.
src/infra/src/db/postgres.rs Adjusted lock_id calculation in PostgresDb implementation to ensure it fits within the range of i64, handling values exceeding i64::MAX.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Service
    participant DB

    Client->>Service: Request to merge files
    Service->>Service: Determine memory mode
    alt strict_memory_mode
        Service->>Service: Call merge_parquet_files_v1
    else less_memory_mode
        Service->>Service: Call merge_parquet_files_v2
    else
        Service->>Service: Call default merge_parquet_files
    end
    Service->>DB: Write merged data
    DB->>Service: Acknowledge write
    Service->>Client: Respond with success
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ☢️ Bug Something isn't working label Jun 4, 2024
@hengfeiyang hengfeiyang requested review from Subhra264 and ansrivas June 4, 2024 07:16
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3409c8a and 125509d.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/config/src/utils/record_batch_ext.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/service/search/mod.rs (5 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
src/config/src/utils/record_batch_ext.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

src/service/search/mod.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

Additional comments not posted (2)
src/config/src/utils/record_batch_ext.rs (1)

486-486: Simplified parameter declaration enhances function safety by avoiding unintended mutations.

src/service/search/mod.rs (1)

47-47: Reorganized import enhances code readability and maintainability.

fix: rollback the change on ingester
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/config/src/utils/record_batch_ext.rs (1)

[!TIP]
Codebase Verification

The output confirms that there are still calls to concat_batches using the old signature in the following files:

  • src/handler/grpc/request/event.rs
  • src/job/files/parquet.rs
  • src/service/compact/flatten.rs

These calls need to be updated to include the new strict_memory_mode parameter.

  • src/handler/grpc/request/event.rs
  • src/job/files/parquet.rs
  • src/service/compact/flatten.rs
Analysis chain

Line range hint 487-518: The addition of strict_memory_mode to concat_batches introduces conditional memory management which aligns with the PR's objective to optimize resource usage. Ensure that all calls to this function have been updated to pass this new parameter.


The script output indicates that there are still calls to concat_batches using the old signature. We need to identify the exact lines and contexts where these calls occur to ensure they are updated to include the new strict_memory_mode parameter.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `concat_batches` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature.
rg --type rust $'concat_batches'

Length of output: 614



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify the exact lines and contexts where the old signature of `concat_batches` is used.

# Search for the old signature usage in the identified files.
rg --type rust 'arrow::compute::concat_batches' src/service/compact/flatten.rs src/job/files/parquet.rs src/handler/grpc/request/event.rs

Length of output: 447

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 125509d and f829807.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/config/src/utils/record_batch_ext.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/job/files/parquet.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/service/compact/merge.rs (4 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (3)
src/config/src/utils/record_batch_ext.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

src/job/files/parquet.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

src/service/compact/merge.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

Additional comments not posted (2)
src/service/compact/merge.rs (2)

688-688: Ensure the strict_memory_mode parameter is consistently used across all relevant function calls.


1035-1035: The addition of strict_memory_mode to merge_parquet_files function is consistent with the PR's objective to manage memory more efficiently.

Comment on lines 1118 to 1130
if strict_memory_mode {
for i in 0..batch_columns_len {
let i = i - sorted_columns.len();
let sorted_column =
arrow::compute::take(&concated_record_batch.remove_column(i), &sort_indices, None)?;
sorted_columns.push(sorted_column);
}
} else {
sorted_columns = concated_record_batch
.columns()
.iter()
.map(|c| arrow::compute::take(c, &sort_indices, None))
.collect::<std::result::Result<Vec<_>, _>>()?;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The sorting logic in strict_memory_mode seems overly complex and might be error-prone due to manual index adjustments. Consider simplifying this logic or using a library function if available.

// Simplify the sorting logic to avoid manual index calculations

.await
} else if stream_type == StreamType::Logs {
merge_parquet_files(thread_id, tmp_dir.name(), schema.clone()).await
merge_parquet_files(thread_id, tmp_dir.name(), schema.clone(), false).await
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Inconsistent handling of strict_memory_mode for StreamType::Logs in merge_parquet_files.

  • src/service/compact/merge.rs: merge_parquet_files is called with true for StreamType::Logs.
  • src/job/files/parquet.rs: merge_parquet_files is called with false for StreamType::Logs.

Please review the memory management strategy for StreamType::Logs to ensure consistent behavior.

Analysis chain

The update to pass strict_memory_mode as false in merge_parquet_files when handling StreamType::Logs is a targeted optimization. Ensure that this behavior is consistent with the expected memory management strategies for logs.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct handling of `strict_memory_mode` in `merge_parquet_files`.

# Test: Search for the function usage with `StreamType::Logs`. Expect: Only occurances with `strict_memory_mode` as false.
rg --type rust $'merge_parquet_files\([^,]*,[^,]*,[^,]*,[^,]*, false\)'

Length of output: 72



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct handling of `strict_memory_mode` in `merge_parquet_files`.

# Test: Search for all instances of `merge_parquet_files` and inspect the parameters passed to it.
rg --type rust 'merge_parquet_files\('

Length of output: 479



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract lines around the instances of `merge_parquet_files` to inspect the parameters passed.

# Extract lines around the instance in `src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs`
rg --type rust -A 3 -B 3 'merge_parquet_files\(' src/service/search/datafusion/exec.rs

# Extract lines around the instances in `src/service/compact/merge.rs`
rg --type rust -A 3 -B 3 'merge_parquet_files\(' src/service/compact/merge.rs

# Extract lines around the instance in `src/job/files/parquet.rs`
rg --type rust -A 3 -B 3 'merge_parquet_files\(' src/job/files/parquet.rs

Length of output: 1122

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f829807 and 35b2942.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/ingester/src/writer.rs (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
src/ingester/src/writer.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

Additional comments not posted (1)
src/ingester/src/writer.rs (1)

246-246: Switching from read to write lock on memtable enhances data integrity during write operations.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35b2942 and 050d0b9.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/infra/src/db/postgres.rs (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
src/infra/src/db/postgres.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/service/compact/merge.rs (1)

Line range hint 1115-1161: Review the implementation of merge_parquet_files_v2.

The function merge_parquet_files_v2 is designed to use less memory but is slower. Consider the following improvements:

  1. The deletion of null columns (lines 1161-1176) could potentially be optimized by using built-in functions or libraries that handle such operations more efficiently.
  2. Ensure that the sorting logic is not overly complex and error-prone due to manual index adjustments.
// Use a more efficient method to drop null columns if available in the used libraries
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 050d0b9 and eae99f5.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/config/src/utils/record_batch_ext.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/job/files/parquet.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/service/compact/merge.rs (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/config/src/utils/record_batch_ext.rs
  • src/job/files/parquet.rs
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
src/service/compact/merge.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: You are a smart rustlang pull request reviewer.
You are going to review all the rustlang files.
Be concise, and add a brief explanation to your suggestions

Make sure the responses are not too verbose and keep the suggestions to the point i.e. actionable.

Additional comments not posted (1)
src/service/compact/merge.rs (1)

688-688: Ensure the correct function is called based on the stream type.

This change correctly uses merge_parquet_files_v2 for StreamType::Logs, which is likely optimized for log data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

☢️ Bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants