Skip to content

fix: histogram for aggregation query #3639

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
bjp232004 merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

fix: histogram for aggregation query #3639

bjp232004 merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

@bjp232004
Copy link
Contributor

@bjp232004 bjp232004 commented May 31, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated internal logic for handling aggs in search results to improve performance and reliability.

@bjp232004 bjp232004 changed the title Update useLogs.ts fix: histogram for aggregation query May 31, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 31, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The useLogs function in useLogs.ts was modified by removing the condition for hasAggregationFlag. This change impacts how the function handles the presence of aggs in searchObj.data.queryResults, simplifying the control flow.

Changes

Files Change Summary
web/src/composables/useLogs.ts Removed the condition for hasAggregationFlag, altering the control flow logic regarding aggs in searchObj.data.queryResults.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant useLogs.ts
    participant searchObj

    User->>useLogs.ts: Call useLogs()
    useLogs.ts->>searchObj: Fetch searchObj.data.queryResults
    alt Without hasAggregationFlag
        useLogs.ts->>searchObj: Process queryResults without checking for hasAggregationFlag
    end
    useLogs.ts->>User: Return processed logs
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed May 31, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/src/composables/useLogs.ts (2)

Line range hint 128-128: Consider replacing any type with more specific types to improve type safety and maintainability.

The usage of any type in TypeScript can lead to potential runtime errors and makes the codebase harder to maintain as it bypasses TypeScript's static type checking. It's recommended to replace any with more specific types wherever possible. If you need assistance with this, I can help identify appropriate types for these instances.

Also applies to: 129-129, 139-139, 143-143, 146-146, 151-151, 153-153, 154-154, 155-155, 156-156, 157-157, 169-169, 170-170, 175-175, 176-176, 186-186, 187-187, 228-228, 240-240, 241-241

Line range hint 228-228: Consider refactoring useLogs to improve maintainability.

The useLogs function is quite large and complex, which can make it difficult to maintain and understand. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused functions or possibly using more composables if applicable. This can improve readability and make the code easier to manage.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60a64fc and 9617caf.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/src/composables/useLogs.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
web/src/composables/useLogs.ts

[error] 128-128: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 129-129: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 139-139: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 143-143: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 146-146: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 151-151: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 153-153: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 154-154: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 155-155: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 156-156: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 157-157: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 169-169: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 170-170: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 175-175: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 176-176: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 186-186: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 187-187: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 228-228: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 240-240: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

[error] 241-241: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

Additional comments not posted (1)
web/src/composables/useLogs.ts (1)

2250-2250: Verify the impact of removing hasAggregationFlag condition.

Ensure that the removal of the hasAggregationFlag condition does not negatively impact the functionality or introduce any bugs. This script will help verify the usage and impact of this change.

@bjp232004 bjp232004 merged commit 05d0d23 into main May 31, 2024
@bjp232004 bjp232004 deleted the enable-histogram-aggregation branch May 31, 2024 04:45
This was referenced Sep 30, 2024
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Oct 10, 2024
Merged
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2024
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2024
Merged
This was referenced Nov 7, 2024
Merged
Closed
Merged
This was referenced Dec 11, 2024
Closed
Merged
This was referenced Dec 23, 2024
Merged
Closed
This was referenced Dec 31, 2024
Closed
Merged
This was referenced Jan 14, 2025
Merged
Closed
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@omkarK06 omkarK06 omkarK06 approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Invalid PR Title 🧹 Updates

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@bjp232004 @omkarK06