Option to return dataframes for listing functions #662
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Neeratyoy
changed the title
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #662 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 90.5% 90.35% -0.16%
===========================================
Files 36 36
Lines 3730 3785 +55
===========================================
+ Hits 3376 3420 +44
- Misses 354 365 +11
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
mfeurer
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Addresses #364.
An optional parameter has been added to the
get_Xfunctions calledoutput_format. Which is by defaultdictso that nothing breaks. Whenoutput_format='dataframe'the output is a pandas data frame.How should this PR be tested?
The following commands should suffice in demonstrating the change:
openml.datasets.list_datasets(size=10)openml.datasets.list_datasets(size=10, output_format='dataframe')openml.tasks.list_tasks(task_type_id=1, size = 10)openml.tasks.list_tasks(task_type_id=1, size = 10, output_format='dataframe')openml.evaluations.list_evaluations('predictive_accuracy', size = 10)openml.evaluations.list_evaluations('predictive_accuracy', size = 10, output_format='object')openml.evaluations.list_evaluations('predictive_accuracy', size = 10, output_format='dataframe')openml.flows.list_flows(size=10)openml.flows.list_flows(size=10, output_format='dataframe')openml.runs.list_runs(size=10)openml.runs.list_runs(size=10, output_format='dataframe')openml.setups.list_setups(size=10)openml.setups.list_setups(size=10, output_format='object')openml.setups.list_setups(size=10, output_format='dataframe')Any other comments?
output_formatincluding the_list_allin utils.py.