Skip to content

Conversation

@mfeurer
Copy link
Collaborator

@mfeurer mfeurer commented Oct 16, 2017

@amueller a lot of this is actually copied from scikit-learn. Is there a special template that I need to follow to make this legally correct?

@mfeurer mfeurer requested a review from amueller October 16, 2017 15:20
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 16, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #368 into develop will increase coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #368      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage    89.37%   89.5%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files           32      32              
  Lines         2683    2744      +61     
==========================================
+ Hits          2398    2456      +58     
- Misses         285     288       +3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
openml/datasets/dataset.py 81.01% <0%> (+3.36%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5b701bb...0d23547. Read the comment docs.

@mfeurer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mfeurer commented Nov 28, 2017

@amueller do you have some time to review this one? I think you're most experienced with user engagement.

CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated
3. Create a ``feature`` branch to hold your development changes:

```bash
$ git checkout -b my-feature
Copy link

@nok nok Feb 4, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer using the branch type as a suffix to keep the overview, i.e.: feature/idea or feature-idea.

@amueller
Copy link
Contributor

amueller commented Feb 6, 2018

sorry @mfeurer not looking at github notifications right now (have 20000+)
What do you mean by legally correct?

@nok
Copy link

nok commented Feb 7, 2018

Legally, because the content of these files are partially copied from the scikit-learn/scikit-learn repository (CONTRIBUTING.md, ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md, PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md) I guess.

@mfeurer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mfeurer commented Feb 7, 2018

Yep, those files are somewhat copied from scikit-learn, so to follow the BSD-license, we need to mention that. How about following this proposal?

@mfeurer mfeurer requested a review from janvanrijn March 29, 2018 08:37
@mfeurer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mfeurer commented Mar 29, 2018

Okay, I just added a note about the files in question and added the license of scikit-learn to our license file. Should be fine like this.

@PGijsbers
Copy link
Collaborator

I can't review anymore since I made the last change, right?

Copy link
Collaborator

@PGijsbers PGijsbers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not an expert on the legality of it, but I seems fine to me. I made a change that mentions how to run unit tests for Windows users briefly.

@mfeurer mfeurer merged commit 6ac98aa into develop Apr 4, 2018
@mfeurer mfeurer deleted the contributing_info branch April 4, 2018 08:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants