-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 211
Add contributing information #368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #368 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.37% 89.5% +0.12%
==========================================
Files 32 32
Lines 2683 2744 +61
==========================================
+ Hits 2398 2456 +58
- Misses 285 288 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
@amueller do you have some time to review this one? I think you're most experienced with user engagement. |
CONTRIBUTING.md
Outdated
| 3. Create a ``feature`` branch to hold your development changes: | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| $ git checkout -b my-feature |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer using the branch type as a suffix to keep the overview, i.e.: feature/idea or feature-idea.
|
sorry @mfeurer not looking at github notifications right now (have 20000+) |
|
Legally, because the content of these files are partially copied from the scikit-learn/scikit-learn repository (CONTRIBUTING.md, ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md, PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md) I guess. |
|
Yep, those files are somewhat copied from scikit-learn, so to follow the BSD-license, we need to mention that. How about following this proposal? |
|
Okay, I just added a note about the files in question and added the license of scikit-learn to our license file. Should be fine like this. |
|
I can't review anymore since I made the last change, right? |
PGijsbers
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not an expert on the legality of it, but I seems fine to me. I made a change that mentions how to run unit tests for Windows users briefly.
@amueller a lot of this is actually copied from scikit-learn. Is there a special template that I need to follow to make this legally correct?