Added documentation for the triple anonymous peer review system#4434
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Siobhan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Siobhan <[email protected]>
S-Haime
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Made some changes to language, otherwise no immediate issues. Will review and edit in more depth as part of Documentation project.
|
Cannae find the original PR, but we may also need a 'quiet' notification to Editors when a Section-Editor assigns the Author as Reviewers in triple anonymous. The Author is ofc also blocked from doing the review (I checked) and if 1-click review is not enabled, they cannot decline. If they do have 1-click access, they can review their own paper and accept it. It throws a server error, but the decision goes through! The section editor would have no way of knowing about this. So a) the (managing) Editor ought to be notified to keep an eye on this and ensure the author declines to review without informing the section-editor of the reason why and b) to ensure this does not happen and slip through the cracks. Not immediately urgent as F&E won't have this issue, but for potential future use. Sentry is being nasty to me, so I cannae check what the error was. |
|
Actually we DEFINITELY need an alert and a half if Authors do ever review their own work (as it would be easy to overlook in a journal with a large number of articles in review - on the overview you'd only see initials, so you'd have to open the article review page to check whilst having the correct permissions). |
When triple anon is enabled perhaps we should just filter out the authors from the reviewer list? |
I considered that, but it would give the game away to the section editor. |
Closes #4426