You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The below changes are requested by a publishing librarian:
Add our first_page and last_page fields to the XML.
The proceedings title should include exactly what is in the journal name and not end with a final space hyphen space.
<proceedings_title>Proceedings of the 7th International Digital Human Modeling Symposium (DHM 2022) and Iowa Virtual Human Summit 2022 - </proceedings_title>
The publisher should come from the journal publisher field not from the press as a whole
<publisher>
<publisher_name>University of Iowa Libraries Publishing</publisher_name>
</publisher>
The article number is important for citation. There is not an article number field in crossref. However, looking at PLoS One (looking at their schema tags and also looking at how it imports into Zotero) I think the article number should map to the first page number. JM question: Can you clarify what you mean here? Are you saying the crossref deposit should use Janeway's article number in Crossref's first page field if there's no first page in Janeway?
Map our page_numbers field to Crossref's field other_pages. JM note: It looks like Crossref's field other_pages is used for items with non-contiguous page information. That's different from our page_numbers field, which is for a custom page range, like with roman numerals or something. I think we should not populate it with our custom page range field because the systems ingesting this info will not expect that field to duplicate info in first_page and last_page, just provide extra info. Something I'm not considering?
The below changes are requested by a publishing librarian:
Add our
first_pageandlast_pagefields to the XML.The proceedings title should include exactly what is in the journal name and not end with a final space hyphen space.
The publisher should come from the journal publisher field not from the press as a whole
The article number is important for citation. There is not an article number field in crossref. However, looking at PLoS One (looking at their schema tags and also looking at how it imports into Zotero) I think the article number should map to the first page number. JM question: Can you clarify what you mean here? Are you saying the crossref deposit should use Janeway's article number in Crossref's first page field if there's no first page in Janeway?
Map our
page_numbersfield to Crossref's fieldother_pages. JM note: It looks like Crossref's fieldother_pagesis used for items with non-contiguous page information. That's different from our page_numbers field, which is for a custom page range, like with roman numerals or something. I think we should not populate it with our custom page range field because the systems ingesting this info will not expect that field to duplicate info in first_page and last_page, just provide extra info. Something I'm not considering?