chore: add pull request title pattern for releases#375
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
WalkthroughUpdates the Release Please configuration to define a custom pull request title pattern. The new pattern formats generated release PR titles as "release: v{version}" where the version number is interpolated at generation time. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #375 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.79% 85.79%
=======================================
Files 26 26
Lines 1267 1267
Branches 249 225 -24
=======================================
Hits 1087 1087
Misses 110 110
Partials 70 70 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a release-please configuration setting so the automatically generated release PR title follows a predictable Conventional Commit format, aligning with this repo’s PR title checks and release workflow trigger conditions.
Changes:
- Configure release-please to use a custom release PR title pattern (
release: v${version}).
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Description
What problem is being solved?
How is it being solved?
What changes are made to solve it?
References
Review Checklist
mainSummary by CodeRabbit