Conversation
Through 07dd1f4 (2023-06-23) Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>
|
Very happy to see this! :) I propose to merge the release notes between the different rc's, and split off even-more-minor-than-minor changes into "Documentation, CI & Governance", see below the fold Merged release notesBreaking changes (but rather conforms to the existing runc implementation)
Deprecations
Additions
Minor fixes
Documentation, CI & Governance
|
utam0k
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚀 🚀 🚀
Thanks, @AkihiroSuda, for your coordination in releasing v1.1.0
I'm not sure about this. |
1.0.0 was a long time ago... I realize it's easier to just reflect what happened per rc, but now a reader needs to scroll over 30-40 almost irrelevant lines to get to the key content of the new version. Note that in a similar discussion for runc, Aleksa brought up https://keepachangelog.com as a reference, which says:
The proposed changelog is not human-friendly. |
tianon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree that a more human-friendly changelog would be nice, and if someone wanted to do the work to create one, we should probably integrate/use it, but the actual spec bits of the above comparison are relatively approachable (honestly, probably more approachable for implementers than the changelog/release notes would be anyhow).
I've made a proposal in the comment above, here again in plain-text for easy of use. It's based on appending the various iterations to rc1 (per section), and then splitting off "Documentation, CI & Governance" (because "Minor fixes" ended up being a giant heap, many of which weren't spec-relevant; obviously there are other subjective choices that could be made in grouping/ordering/etc.) |
Co-Authored-By: H. Vetinari <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>
bf5f6d3 to
3f552ce
Compare
|
Squashed the ChangeLog (Thanks to @h-vetinari) |
|
ping @opencontainers/runtime-spec-maintainers |
|
👋 Hi, @crosbymichael @dqminh @kolyshkin @mrunalp @thaJeztah |
|
Sounds like quorum has been reached. :) |
|
Let me merge the spec v1.1 PR and this blog PR simultaneously:
|
Changes (v1.1.0-rc.3 → v1.1.0)
Minor fixes and documentation:
Changes (v1.1.0-rc.2 → v1.1.0-rc.3)
Additions:
Minor fixes and documentation:
ociVersionin example (chore: Update ociVersion in config-linux.md example #1199)s/features document/Features structure/g(glossary: s/features document/Features structure/g #1203)Changes (v1.1.0-rc.1 → v1.1.0-rc.2)
Additions
features.mdto formalize therunc featuresJSON (Addfeatures.mdto formalize therunc featuresJSON #1130)Minor fixes and documentation
When serialized in JSON, the format MUST adhere to the following pattern(runtime: removeWhen serialized in JSON, the format MUST adhere to the following pattern#1178)Changes (v1.0.2 → v1.1.0-rc.1)
Breaking changes (but rather conforms to the existing runc implementation)
Deprecations
Additions
Minor fixes and documentation
LinuxSeccompFlags #1138)[runtime-spec VOTE] tag ac7bb22 as v1.1.0 (closes Mon Jul 3 06:02:25 AM UTC 2023)(at least 8 of 12 maintainers needed for this resolution to pass):Closes #1052