s/should/SHOULD/ in a few spots, also a s/should/must/ #614
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
March 14, 2017 03:02
Signed-off-by: Erik Hollensbe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Erik Hollensbe <[email protected]>
Contributor
|
LGTM overall, but the changes to config.md are really crying out for something like #492 to land, so we can clarify the image<->runtime relationship. |
Member
|
LGTM |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The capslock changes speak for themselves. I tried to avoid situations where deliberately capitalizing SHOULD were too prescriptive.
As for the s/should/MUST/, I think it's appropriate here as there will never be a situation where aborting on invalid keys is a thing that is allowed. I hope you agree that this is an appropriate change.
Thanks!