feat(ios): refresh onboarding setup flow by thats2easyyy · Pull Request #98868 · openclaw/openclaw

thats2easyyy · 2026-07-02T03:05:05Z

What Problem This Solves

The iOS first-run and gateway setup surfaces had uneven visual treatment and unclear setup hierarchy, which made a new user's first impression feel less polished than the rest of OpenClaw.

Summary

Refreshes the onboarding and gateway setup flow with OpenClaw-branded UI polish, clearer QR/manual setup steps, and SwiftUI smoke coverage for the updated screens.

Evidence

Current fixed head: d8a67249eb.
Built and ran on the iPhone 17 Pro simulator with XcodeBuildMCP.
Current-head simulator walkthrough used --openclaw-reset-onboarding --openclaw-initial-tab settings --openclaw-initial-destination settings and verified: onboarding intro with Continue/Close, Connect Gateway with openclaw qr and Connect Manually, manual setup with Enter setup code, APPLE-REVIEW-DEMO setup code application, success state with You're connected, Apple Review Demo Gateway, and Go to Chat, then Chat tab selected after tapping Go to Chat.
XcodeBuildMCP OpenClawTests/OnboardingRefreshGuardTests: 3 passed, 0 failed.
XcodeBuildMCP OpenClawUITests/OpenClawSnapshotUITests/testOnboardingPairCommandAndCompletionOpenChat: 1 passed, 0 failed.
pnpm native:i18n:check: passed.
swiftformat --lint --config config/swiftformat on touched Swift files: passed.
git diff --check: passed.

clawsweeper · 2026-07-02T03:12:41Z

Codex review: needs maintainer review before merge. Reviewed July 5, 2026, 6:44 PM ET / 22:44 UTC.

Summary
Refreshes the iOS onboarding and quick setup screens, setup-code/manual connection flow, brand UI components, localization inventory, and Swift/i18n smoke coverage.

PR surface: Tests +18, Other +1008. Total +1026 across 16 files.

Reproducibility: not applicable. this is a user-facing iOS UX refresh rather than a bug report. The relevant proof path is the simulator walkthrough and UI/smoke coverage for onboarding, setup code, success, and Chat handoff.

Review metrics: 1 noteworthy metric.

User-facing setup surfaces: 2 refreshed. Both first-run onboarding and the quick setup sheet change, so maintainers should make an explicit UX acceptance call before merge.

Stored data model
Persistent data-model change detected: serialized state: test/scripts/apple-app-i18n.test.ts. Confirm migration or upgrade compatibility proof before merge.

Merge readiness
Overall: 🐚 platinum hermit
Proof: 🦞 diamond lobster ✨ media proof bonus
Patch quality: 🐚 platinum hermit
Result: ready for maintainer review.

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality, so missing proof can cap an otherwise strong patch.

Rank-up moves:

Wait for the remaining exact-head CI jobs to complete.
Have the assigned iOS reviewer make the final UX/product acceptance call.

Risk before merge

[P1] This is a broad first-run/setup UX refresh, so final acceptance is a product/design judgment rather than a purely mechanical correctness call.
[P1] At inspection time, two exact-head CI jobs were still in progress; landing should wait for required current-head checks to finish.

Maintainer options:

Decide the mitigation before merge
Land the refreshed iOS onboarding/setup flow after the assigned iOS reviewer accepts the UX direction and exact-head CI finishes; if not accepted, narrow the visual refresh instead of adding a parallel setup path.
Pause or close
Do not merge this PR until maintainers decide whether the risk is worth taking.

Next step before merge

[P2] No narrow code repair is identified; the remaining action is maintainer UX/product acceptance and exact-head CI completion.

Maintainer decision needed

Question: Should OpenClaw accept this refreshed iOS first-run and gateway setup UX as the product direction for the iOS app now?
Rationale: The patch appears mechanically coherent, but it changes a first-run product surface and visual hierarchy where maintainers need to own the UX decision.
Likely owner: Solvely-Colin — Solvely-Colin is the live assignee and current branch finisher for the iOS onboarding/setup refresh.
Options:
- Accept after checks finish (recommended): Approve the refreshed onboarding/setup direction once the remaining exact-head CI jobs complete successfully.
- Request narrower UX iteration: Keep the implementation open but ask for a smaller follow-up if the visual or setup hierarchy is not the desired iOS direction.
- Pause the refresh: Close or park the PR if maintainers do not want a first-run setup redesign in core right now.

Security
Cleared: No concrete security or supply-chain concern found; the diff stays in Swift UI/onboarding, tests, and i18n inventory without new dependencies, workflow permissions, or secret handling surfaces.

Review details

Best possible solution:

Land the refreshed iOS onboarding/setup flow after the assigned iOS reviewer accepts the UX direction and exact-head CI finishes; if not accepted, narrow the visual refresh instead of adding a parallel setup path.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Not applicable: this is a user-facing iOS UX refresh rather than a bug report. The relevant proof path is the simulator walkthrough and UI/smoke coverage for onboarding, setup code, success, and Chat handoff.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

Yes for implementation shape, pending product acceptance: the code stays in the iOS onboarding/quick setup owner boundary, uses branded typography/i18n coverage, and adds focused UI/render tests. The remaining question is whether maintainers want this exact first-run UX direction.

AGENTS.md: found and applied where relevant.

Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against 37c67b0d27b3.

Label changes

Label changes:

add proof: sufficient: Contributor real behavior proof is sufficient. Simulator screenshots/comments plus the current-head real-behavior-proof check show the onboarding/setup path after the refresh, including setup code, success state, and Chat handoff.
add proof: 📸 screenshot: Contributor real behavior proof includes screenshot evidence. Simulator screenshots/comments plus the current-head real-behavior-proof check show the onboarding/setup path after the refresh, including setup code, success state, and Chat handoff.
add rating: 🐚 platinum hermit: Overall readiness is 🐚 platinum hermit; proof is 🦞 diamond lobster and patch quality is 🐚 platinum hermit.
add status: 👀 ready for maintainer look: ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. Sufficient (screenshot): Simulator screenshots/comments plus the current-head real-behavior-proof check show the onboarding/setup path after the refresh, including setup code, success state, and Chat handoff.

Label justifications:

P2: This is a normal-priority iOS first-run/setup improvement with focused app impact and no emergency regression evidence.
rating: 🐚 platinum hermit: Overall readiness is 🐚 platinum hermit; proof is 🦞 diamond lobster and patch quality is 🐚 platinum hermit.
status: 👀 ready for maintainer look: ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. Sufficient (screenshot): Simulator screenshots/comments plus the current-head real-behavior-proof check show the onboarding/setup path after the refresh, including setup code, success state, and Chat handoff.
proof: sufficient: Contributor real behavior proof is sufficient. Simulator screenshots/comments plus the current-head real-behavior-proof check show the onboarding/setup path after the refresh, including setup code, success state, and Chat handoff.
proof: 📸 screenshot: Contributor real behavior proof includes screenshot evidence. Simulator screenshots/comments plus the current-head real-behavior-proof check show the onboarding/setup path after the refresh, including setup code, success state, and Chat handoff.

Evidence reviewed

PR surface:

Tests +18, Other +1008. Total +1026 across 16 files.

View PR surface stats

Area	Files	Added	Removed	Net
Source	0	0	0	0
Tests	2	19	1	+18
Docs	0	0	0	0
Config	0	0	0	0
Generated	0	0	0	0
Other	14	1951	943	+1008
Total	16	1970	944	+1026

What I checked:

Repository policy read: Root and iOS scoped AGENTS.md were read; the iOS typography and test guidance applied because the PR changes SwiftUI text surfaces and related tests. (apps/ios/AGENTS.md:1, 37c67b0d27b3)
Onboarding UI refresh: The PR head renders the refreshed onboarding welcome actions with Scan QR, Connect Manually, and the restored Go to Chat completion CTA. (apps/ios/Sources/Onboarding/OnboardingWizardSteps.swift:300, cff2659a8964)
Setup-code flow: The setup-code path parses the entered setup code, applies the gateway link, clears keyboard focus before transition, navigates to the connection step, and then attempts the manual connection. (apps/ios/Sources/Onboarding/OnboardingWizardView.swift:960, cff2659a8964)
Quick setup surface: The quick setup sheet stays in the iOS owner boundary and uses the existing gateway controller/app model path while refreshing the candidate, empty, problem, and dismissal states. (apps/ios/Sources/Gateway/GatewayQuickSetupSheet.swift:18, cff2659a8964)
Behavior coverage: The updated UI test drives first-run onboarding through manual setup, the Apple review demo code, success state, and Go to Chat tab selection. (apps/ios/UITests/OpenClawSnapshotUITests.swift:353, cff2659a8964)
Render smoke coverage: SwiftUI smoke coverage now builds quick setup candidate/empty states and onboarding activation screens across appearance and accessibility type size. (apps/ios/Tests/SwiftUIRenderSmokeTests.swift:132, cff2659a8964)

Likely related people:

Solvely-Colin: Live PR metadata lists Solvely-Colin as assignee, and the current head commit plus finish-line comments describe preserving setup-link/QR/provider behavior while completing the onboarding refresh. (role: assigned reviewer and current branch maintainer; confidence: high; commits: cff2659a8964; files: apps/ios/Sources/Onboarding/OnboardingWizardView.swift, apps/ios/Sources/Onboarding/OnboardingWizardSteps.swift, apps/ios/Sources/Gateway/GatewayQuickSetupSheet.swift)
steipete: Current-main blame/log on the onboarding, quick setup, and RootTabs iOS surfaces points to Peter Steinberger's recent commit that carries the existing behavior this PR modifies. (role: current-main area contributor; confidence: medium; commits: a04b6ced4f96; files: apps/ios/Sources/Onboarding/OnboardingWizardView.swift, apps/ios/Sources/Onboarding/OnboardingWizardSteps.swift, apps/ios/Sources/Gateway/GatewayQuickSetupSheet.swift)
jcooley8: Merged PR Polish iOS onboarding and chat critique fixes #99243 recently handled overlapping iOS onboarding/chat critique fixes, including the Chat handoff behavior this PR preserves. (role: adjacent merged iOS onboarding contributor; confidence: medium; commits: e43c72954a30; files: apps/ios/Sources/Onboarding/OnboardingWizardSteps.swift, apps/ios/Sources/RootTabs.swift, apps/ios/UITests/OpenClawSnapshotUITests.swift)

What the crustacean ranks mean

🦀 challenger crab: rare, exceptional readiness with strong proof, clean implementation, and convincing validation.
🦞 diamond lobster: very strong readiness with only minor maintainer review expected.
🐚 platinum hermit: good normal PR, likely mergeable with ordinary maintainer review.
🦐 gold shrimp: useful signal, but proof or patch confidence is still limited.
🦪 silver shellfish: thin signal; proof, validation, or implementation needs work.
🧂 unranked krab: not merge-ready because proof is missing/unusable or there are serious correctness or safety concerns.
🌊 off-meta tidepool: rating does not apply to this item.

Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

How this review workflow works

ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

Review history (23 earlier review cycles; latest 8 shown)

reviewed 2026-07-05T15:52:20.398Z sha 26f6bce :: needs changes before merge. :: [P2] Keep quick setup instruction copy localized | [P1] Preserve existing developer-local onboarding state
reviewed 2026-07-05T21:09:14.297Z sha 2145c54 :: needs real behavior proof before merge. :: [P2] Keep the completion CTA explicit about Chat
reviewed 2026-07-05T21:23:07.594Z sha c500851 :: needs real behavior proof before merge. :: [P2] Restore the Chat-specific completion CTA | [P2] Remove dead Swift symbols before merge
reviewed 2026-07-05T21:35:27.047Z sha b1338d9 :: needs real behavior proof before merge. :: [P2] Restore the Chat-specific completion CTA | [P2] Remove the Swift symbols left dead by this refactor
reviewed 2026-07-05T21:49:25.049Z sha c7e8edf :: needs changes before merge. :: [P2] Restore the Chat-specific completion CTA
reviewed 2026-07-05T21:55:29.326Z sha c7e8edf :: needs changes before merge. :: [P2] Restore the Chat-specific completion CTA
reviewed 2026-07-05T22:04:16.362Z sha 3581b8f :: needs maintainer review before merge. :: none
reviewed 2026-07-05T22:10:05.045Z sha 3581b8f :: needs maintainer review before merge. :: none

thats2easyyy · 2026-07-03T03:36:58Z

revised and updated UI, based on josh's feedback from discord

thats2easyyy · 2026-07-03T09:50:26Z

thats2easyyy · 2026-07-04T21:44:01Z

@clawsweeper re-review

clawsweeper · 2026-07-04T21:44:04Z

🦞🧹
ClawSweeper re-review requested.

I asked ClawSweeper to review this item again.
Action: item re-review queued (workflow sweep.yml, event repository_dispatch).
Result: the existing ClawSweeper review comment will be edited in place when the review finishes.

thats2easyyy · 2026-07-04T22:21:47Z

@clawsweeper re-review

clawsweeper · 2026-07-04T22:21:49Z

🦞🧹
ClawSweeper re-review requested.

I asked ClawSweeper to review this item again.
Action: item re-review queued (workflow sweep.yml, event repository_dispatch).
Result: the existing ClawSweeper review comment will be edited in place when the review finishes.

thats2easyyy · 2026-07-04T22:27:18Z

@clawsweeper re-review

thats2easyyy · 2026-07-04T23:33:51Z

@clawsweeper re-review

Current head d8a67249eb is rebased onto origin/main (4682364fa6) and CI is green: 79 passing, 21 skipped, 1 neutral, 0 failing, 0 pending. The previous actionable items were addressed: the completion CTA is back to Go to Chat, quick setup text uses OpenClawType, the onboarding UI test covers the Chat handoff, and the PR Evidence section has been refreshed with the current head.

clawsweeper · 2026-07-04T23:33:53Z

🦞🧹
ClawSweeper re-review requested.

I asked ClawSweeper to review this item again.
Action: item re-review queued (workflow sweep.yml, event repository_dispatch).
Result: the existing ClawSweeper review comment will be edited in place when the review finishes.

Solvely-Colin · 2026-07-05T21:29:22Z

Maintainer finish-line update pushed: b1338d98c59a1ef4773bcc21ad2a45ab8abf0924.

What changed in the maintainer refresh:

Rebased Tyler's onboarding/setup refresh onto latest main available during local proof (8c19dbfb627cebc5edb613407246db643e9f5d68). GitHub advanced main again immediately after the push; PR feat(ios): refresh onboarding setup flow #98868 is still MERGEABLE and CI is queued on the new head.
Preserved latest-main setup-link/QR staging and provider-settings behavior while keeping the refreshed first-run setup flow.
Hid the developer-local mode from normal users unless the stored onboarding mode already needs it.
Fixed the setup-code submit/navigation path by clearing focus before the step transition.
Kept refreshed onboarding/quick-setup text on the iOS typography/i18n path. English fallback catalog entries are now marked new, not falsely translated, unless a real native locale value exists.

Local proof run on the pushed diff before force-with-lease:

node --import tsx scripts/native-app-i18n.ts check — pass (entries=2553 changed=false)
node --import tsx scripts/apple-app-i18n.ts check — pass (catalogs=2 keys=116)
node scripts/run-vitest.mjs test/scripts/apple-app-i18n.test.ts test/scripts/native-app-i18n.test.ts — pass (2 files, 8 tests)
XcodeBuildMCP OpenClawTests/OpenClawTypographyTests — pass (9/9)
XcodeBuildMCP OpenClawTests/SwiftUIRenderSmokeTests — pass (19/19)
XcodeBuildMCP build/install/launch on iPhone 17 Pro simulator — pass
git diff --check && git diff --cached --check — pass
Scoped autoreview against iOS onboarding/setup + typography/i18n — clean, no accepted/actionable findings

Simulator proof artifact from the final local run:

/var/folders/29/t5g8cdc123j4f14j51n8rzg00000gn/T/screenshot_optimized_854da4d6-be96-4ea0-85bf-e31f2c2f63cb.jpg

Known caveat: Xcode repeatedly rewrote apps/swabble/Package.resolved during simulator proof; that unrelated local churn was restored and is not part of the PR diff.

@clawsweeper re-review

clawsweeper · 2026-07-05T21:29:25Z

🦞🧹
ClawSweeper re-review requested.

I asked ClawSweeper to review this item again.
Action: item re-review queued (workflow sweep.yml, event repository_dispatch).
Result: the existing ClawSweeper review comment will be edited in place when the review finishes.

Solvely-Colin · 2026-07-05T21:44:57Z

Maintainer follow-up pushed: c7e8edf3743.

This rebases the PR cleanup onto current origin/main (45f561ab6c24de9848b70823c80b7ac770531c41) and fixes the red Scan iOS dead code CI lane by deleting the unused iOS design/onboarding symbols Periphery reported, rather than suppressing them.

Local proof on the pushed SHA:

node --import tsx scripts/native-app-i18n.ts check - pass
node --import tsx scripts/apple-app-i18n.ts check - pass
node scripts/run-vitest.mjs test/scripts/apple-app-i18n.test.ts test/scripts/native-app-i18n.test.ts - pass, 2 files / 8 tests
periphery scan --config apps/ios/.periphery.yml --strict from apps/ios after project generation - pass, no findings emitted
XcodeBuildMCP OpenClawTests/OpenClawTypographyTests - pass, 9 tests
XcodeBuildMCP OpenClawTests/SwiftUIRenderSmokeTests - pass, 19 tests
git diff --check && git diff --cached --check - pass
Scoped autoreview against origin/main - clean, no accepted/actionable findings

Notes:

The Xcode test runs still report existing SwiftLint-style size/complexity warnings in adjacent app/shared files, but no test failures.
I intentionally restored Xcode-generated apps/swabble/Package.resolved drift after local generation/test runs so this PR stays scoped to the iOS onboarding/setup refresh and the required i18n/test support.

@clawsweeper re-review

clawsweeper · 2026-07-05T21:45:00Z

🦞🧹
ClawSweeper re-review requested.

I asked ClawSweeper to review this item again.
Action: item re-review queued (workflow sweep.yml, event repository_dispatch).
Result: the existing ClawSweeper review comment will be edited in place when the review finishes.

Solvely-Colin · 2026-07-05T22:00:34Z

Follow-up pushed: 3581b8f22cd.

Addressed the review finding about the completed onboarding CTA: the success screen now restores the explicit destination cue from current main, using Go to Chat with the chat bubble icon instead of the generic Get started label.

Additional local proof on the rebased SHA (origin/main 1a37cafd63b6b463af4a77a1a19d2d1e0d77adf4):

node --import tsx scripts/native-app-i18n.ts check - pass
node --import tsx scripts/apple-app-i18n.ts check - pass
node scripts/run-vitest.mjs test/scripts/apple-app-i18n.test.ts test/scripts/native-app-i18n.test.ts - pass, 2 files / 8 tests
periphery scan --config apps/ios/.periphery.yml --strict from apps/ios - pass, no findings emitted
XcodeBuildMCP OpenClawTests/OpenClawTypographyTests - pass, 9 tests
XcodeBuildMCP OpenClawTests/SwiftUIRenderSmokeTests - pass, 19 tests
git diff --check && git diff --cached --check - pass
Scoped autoreview for the CTA fix - clean, no accepted/actionable findings

@clawsweeper re-review

clawsweeper · 2026-07-05T22:00:37Z

🦞🧹
ClawSweeper re-review requested.

I asked ClawSweeper to review this item again.
Action: item re-review queued (workflow sweep.yml, event repository_dispatch).
Result: the existing ClawSweeper review comment will be edited in place when the review finishes.

Solvely-Colin · 2026-07-05T22:19:20Z

@clawsweeper re-review

…refresh-clean-98868 # Conflicts: # apps/ios/Sources/Onboarding/OnboardingWizardView.swift

thats2easyyy force-pushed the tyler/ios-onboarding-refresh branch from 954c11e to 1b4affb Compare July 3, 2026 01:50

thats2easyyy force-pushed the tyler/ios-onboarding-refresh branch from 1b4affb to ae10b98 Compare July 3, 2026 03:03

openclaw-barnacle Bot added the channel: telegram Channel integration: telegram label Jul 3, 2026

clawsweeper Bot added rating: 🧂 unranked krab Not merge-ready due to missing proof or serious correctness/safety concerns. and removed rating: 🦪 silver shellfish Thin PR readiness signal; proof, validation, or implementation needs work. labels Jul 3, 2026

thats2easyyy force-pushed the tyler/ios-onboarding-refresh branch from b028622 to 30032d7 Compare July 3, 2026 09:53

openclaw-barnacle Bot added the app: android App: android label Jul 3, 2026

clawsweeper Bot added rating: 🦐 gold shrimp Decent PR readiness signal, but merge confidence is limited. and removed rating: 🧂 unranked krab Not merge-ready due to missing proof or serious correctness/safety concerns. labels Jul 3, 2026

thats2easyyy force-pushed the tyler/ios-onboarding-refresh branch from f014fd2 to 25d32a0 Compare July 4, 2026 04:26

clawsweeper Bot added the merge-risk: 🚨 automation 🚨 May affect CI, automerge, proof capture, label sync, or maintainer automation. label Jul 4, 2026

clawsweeper Bot mentioned this pull request Jul 4, 2026

Polish iOS onboarding and chat critique fixes #99243

Merged

thats2easyyy force-pushed the tyler/ios-onboarding-refresh branch from 25d32a0 to 55d8610 Compare July 4, 2026 21:06

thats2easyyy force-pushed the tyler/ios-onboarding-refresh branch 3 times, most recently from 50a1fe9 to 7a5cbda Compare July 4, 2026 21:19

Solvely-Colin added 4 commits July 5, 2026 18:35

feat(ios): refresh onboarding setup flow

cff2659

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into codex/ios-onboarding-…

59d8cbf

…refresh-clean-98868 # Conflicts: # apps/ios/Sources/Onboarding/OnboardingWizardView.swift

fix(ios): restore onboarding mascot glyph

e46b3be

chore(ios): sync onboarding i18n inventory

febec7b

github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2026

📡 Upstream Digest — 2026-07-06 02:26 UTC curtismercier/openclaw-mods#1220

Open

ly85206559 mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2026

fix(ios): full-row Settings toggles on iOS 26 #99888

Merged

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Conversation

thats2easyyy commented Jul 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What Problem This Solves

Summary

Evidence

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

thats2easyyy commented Jul 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

thats2easyyy commented Jul 3, 2026

Uh oh!

thats2easyyy commented Jul 4, 2026

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 4, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

thats2easyyy commented Jul 4, 2026

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 4, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

thats2easyyy commented Jul 4, 2026

Uh oh!

thats2easyyy commented Jul 4, 2026

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 4, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Solvely-Colin commented Jul 5, 2026

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Solvely-Colin commented Jul 5, 2026

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Solvely-Colin commented Jul 5, 2026

Uh oh!

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Solvely-Colin commented Jul 5, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

thats2easyyy commented Jul 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

thats2easyyy commented Jul 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 4, 2026 •

edited

Loading

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 4, 2026 •

edited

Loading

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 4, 2026 •

edited

Loading

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

clawsweeper Bot commented Jul 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading