fix(feishu): use resolved runtime config for gateway sends#89403
fix(feishu): use resolved runtime config for gateway sends#89403Pluviobyte wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Codex review: needs real behavior proof before merge. Reviewed June 29, 2026, 9:07 PM ET / 01:07 UTC. Summary PR surface: Source +1, Tests +101. Total +102 across 3 files. Reproducibility: yes. at source level: Feishu appSecret is a documented SecretRef surface, Review metrics: 1 noteworthy metric.
Stored data model Root-cause cluster Members:
Proposal only: this assessment does not dispatch repair, suppress jobs, mutate sibling items, close, or merge anything. Merge readiness Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality, so missing proof can cap an otherwise strong patch. Rank-up moves:
Proof guidance:
Risk before merge
Maintainer options:
Next step before merge
Security Review findings
Review detailsBest possible solution: Land one canonical Feishu SecretRef media fix after redacted proof covers the relevant gateway send, outbound adapter, and source-channel reply-dispatcher delivery paths, or narrow this PR so it no longer closes the canonical user report. Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue? Yes, at source level: Feishu appSecret is a documented SecretRef surface, Is this the best way to solve the issue? No, not as the complete linked-issue fix. The patch is a plausible gateway-send repair, but the best fix should also cover the Feishu outbound and source-channel reply-dispatcher media paths or narrow the PR so it does not close the broader report. Full review comments:
Overall correctness: patch is incorrect AGENTS.md: found and applied where relevant. Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against 54b09580f61b. Label changesLabel justifications:
Evidence reviewedPR surface: Source +1, Tests +101. Total +102 across 3 files. View PR surface stats
What I checked:
Likely related people:
What the crustacean ranks mean
Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics. How this review workflow works
Review history (1 earlier review cycle)
|
4959c7d to
9ffd764
Compare
|
Updated this draft to follow the review direction in the latest push ( What changed:
Validation run locally:
I have not attached live Feishu proof yet; this should stay draft until there is a redacted real-behavior run. |
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale due to inactivity. |
Summary
Fixes #89338.
Validation
Remaining