Skip to content

test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario#83717

Merged
clawsweeper[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-83578
May 18, 2026
Merged

test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario#83717
clawsweeper[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-83578

Conversation

@clawsweeper

@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Makes #83578 merge-ready for the ClawSweeper automerge loop.
The edit pass should inspect the live PR diff, review comments, and failing checks; rebase if needed; keep the contributor branch credited; and stop only when validation is green or an external blocker is proven.

ClawSweeper 🐠 replacement reef notes:

  • Repair fallback: GitHub rejected the repair branch push because it updates workflow files and the ClawSweeper app token does not have workflows permission

Co-author credit kept:

fish notes: model gpt-5.5, reasoning high; reviewed against 46eb0af.

@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added docs Improvements or additions to documentation size: M extensions: qa-lab clawsweeper:automerge Maintainer opted this PR into bounded ClawSweeper-reviewed automerge proof: supplied External PR includes structured after-fix real behavior proof. proof: sufficient ClawSweeper judged the real behavior proof convincing. P3 Low-priority cleanup, docs, polish, ergonomics, or speculative work. rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. status: 👀 ready for maintainer look ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. clawsweeper Tracked by ClawSweeper automation labels May 18, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot mentioned this pull request May 18, 2026
Closed
@openclaw-barnacle openclaw-barnacle Bot removed proof: supplied External PR includes structured after-fix real behavior proof. proof: sufficient ClawSweeper judged the real behavior proof convincing. labels May 18, 2026
@clawsweeper

clawsweeper Bot commented May 18, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Codex review: passed.

Workflow note: Future ClawSweeper reviews update this same comment in place.

How this review workflow works
  • ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
  • Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
  • A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
  • PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
  • Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
  • Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
  • Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
  • Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

Summary
Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.

Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. The source PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

PR rating
Overall: 🦞 diamond lobster
Proof: 🦞 diamond lobster
Patch quality: 🦞 diamond lobster
Summary: Strong live-output proof and a focused QA-Lab implementation make this above-average and ready for normal maintainer or automerge gates.

What the crustacean ranks mean
  • 🦀 challenger crab: rare, exceptional readiness with strong proof, clean implementation, and convincing validation.
  • 🦞 diamond lobster: very strong readiness with only minor maintainer review expected.
  • 🐚 platinum hermit: good normal PR, likely mergeable with ordinary maintainer review.
  • 🦐 gold shrimp: useful signal, but proof or patch confidence is still limited.
  • 🦪 silver shellfish: thin signal; proof, validation, or implementation needs work.
  • 🧂 unranked krab: not merge-ready because proof is missing/unusable or there are serious correctness or safety concerns.
  • 🌊 off-meta tidepool: rating does not apply to this item.

Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

PR egg
✨ Hatched: 🥚 common Velvet Proofling

        /\     /\            
      _/  \___/  \_          
     /  ( o   o )  \         
    |      \_/      |        
    |   /\  ===  /\ |        
     \_/  \_____/  \_/       
        _/|_| |_|\_          
       /__| | | |__\         
          ' ' ' '            
         /_/     \_\         
       .-----------.         
      '-------------'

Rarity: 🥚 common.
Trait: polishes edge cases.
Share on X: post this hatch
Copy: My PR egg hatched a 🥚 common Velvet Proofling in ClawSweeper.

What is this egg doing here?
  • Eggs appear after the PR passes real-behavior proof. It is here for vibes, not verdicts: it does not change labels, ratings, merge decisions, or automation.
  • The shell reacts to review momentum: open follow-up work warms it up, re-review makes it wobble, and a clean final review lets it hatch.
  • How to hatch it: reach status: 👀 ready for maintainer look or status: 🚀 automerge armed; that usually means sufficient real-behavior proof, no blocking P0/P1/P2 findings, no security attention needed, and clean correctness.
  • The hatch is seeded from this repository and PR number, so the same PR keeps the same creature; the reviewed head SHA can only change safe visual details.
  • Rarity is just collectible sparkle: 🥚 common, 🌱 uncommon, 💎 rare, ✨ glimmer, and 🌈 legendary.

Real behavior proof
Sufficient (live_output): The source PR includes copied live QA-Lab output from a real gateway child with qa-channel and mock-openai, plus focused and full-pack validation after the patch.

Next step before merge
No repair lane is needed because the review found no actionable patch defect; continue through exact-head automerge and normal maintainer gates.

Security
Cleared: No concrete security or supply-chain concern was found; the diff adds fake redaction fixtures and QA-Lab logic only, with no dependency, workflow, credential, install, or production secret-handling changes.

Review details

Best possible solution:

Land the focused QA-Lab scenario with its deterministic mock-provider path and pack guards once exact-head checks pass, preserving the original contributor attribution.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Not applicable: this PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. The source PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

Yes: the patch uses the existing repo-backed QA scenario pattern by adding a markdown flow, deterministic mock-provider support, pack registration, guard tests, docs, and changelog coverage without widening production behavior.

Label justifications:

  • P3: This is a low-risk QA-Lab scenario and documentation addition with no production runtime behavior change.

What I checked:

  • Current-main gap: Current main has no share-safe diagnostics scenario or mock-provider branch, so the central PR change is not already implemented. (bf9329486b94)
  • Scenario contract: The added scenario defines the diagnostics objective, fake raw fixture, required safe artifact fields, forbidden fake personal markers, artifact/reply leak checks, and mock read-before-write assertions. (qa/scenarios/personal/share-safe-diagnostics-artifact.md:19, 46eb0af9e42e)
  • Mock provider path: The mock OpenAI provider gains a deterministic diagnostics read/read/write/reply flow keyed by the scenario prompt and safe marker. (extensions/qa-lab/src/providers/mock-openai/server.ts:1912, 46eb0af9e42e)
  • Pack registration and guard tests: The PR appends the scenario to the personal-agent pack and extends pack tests to assert the scenario id, prompt, artifact name, write path, read-before-write guard, and forbiddenNeedles checks. (extensions/qa-lab/src/scenario-packs.test.ts:41, 46eb0af9e42e)
  • Merge against current main: A read-only merge-tree check shows the PR changes auto-merge onto current main with only the expected changelog/QA/doc additions and no conflict markers. (bf9329486b94)
  • Real behavior proof from source PR: The linked source PR reports after-patch live QA-Lab output from a real gateway child with qa-channel and mock-openai, plus focused pack/catalog tests, full personal-agent pack proof, docs checks, and type checks. (46eb0af9e42e)

Likely related people:

  • @iFiras-Max1: The replacement commit is authored from the source contribution, and current changelog history credits this handle for the personal-agent pack, pack selector, approval-denial scenario, task-followthrough scenario, and adjacent dreaming scenario work. (role: source contributor and repeated personal-agent QA-Lab scenario contributor; confidence: high; commits: 46eb0af9e42e, 46c622aa3b35; files: qa/scenarios/personal/share-safe-diagnostics-artifact.md, extensions/qa-lab/src/scenario-packs.ts, extensions/qa-lab/src/providers/mock-openai/server.ts)
  • @vincentkoc: Recent history shows Vincent Koc committed the adjacent dreaming scenario that changed the same mock provider and authored a later release-gate repair touching that file. (role: recent QA-Lab mock-provider merger and release-fix contributor; confidence: medium; commits: 46c622aa3b35, cb408bb06b1a; files: extensions/qa-lab/src/providers/mock-openai/server.ts)
  • @100yenadmin: Current changelog entries credit this handle for several nearby QA-Lab runtime parity, coverage, and release-check surfaces that govern how QA-Lab scenarios are validated. (role: adjacent QA-Lab runtime and coverage contributor; confidence: medium; files: CHANGELOG.md, extensions/qa-lab/src)

Codex review notes: model gpt-5.5, reasoning high; reviewed against bf9329486b94.

@clawsweeper

clawsweeper Bot commented May 18, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🦞✅
ClawSweeper merged this PR after the passing review.

Source: clawsweeper[bot]
Feedback: structured ClawSweeper verdict: pass (sha=46eb0af9e42e6099f3fd953a5cd5e15a106af8f5)
Merge status: merged by ClawSweeper automerge
Merged at: 2026-05-18T18:56:25Z
Merge commit: 70f580041f84

What merged:

  • Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
  • Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:

  • No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

The automerge loop is complete.

Automerge progress:

  • 2026-05-18 18:50:22 UTC review queued 46eb0af9e42e (queued)
  • 2026-05-18 18:56:13 UTC review passed 46eb0af9e42e (structured ClawSweeper verdict: pass (sha=46eb0af9e42e6099f3fd953a5cd5e15a106af...)
  • 2026-05-18 18:56:28 UTC merged 46eb0af9e42e (merged by ClawSweeper automerge)

@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added proof: sufficient ClawSweeper judged the real behavior proof convincing. rating: 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong PR readiness with only minor maintainer review expected. status: 🚀 automerge armed This PR is in ClawSweeper's automerge lane. and removed rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. status: 👀 ready for maintainer look ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. labels May 18, 2026
@clawsweeper
clawsweeper Bot merged commit 70f5800 into main May 18, 2026
188 of 206 checks passed
@clawsweeper
clawsweeper Bot deleted the clawsweeper/automerge-openclaw-openclaw-83578 branch May 18, 2026 18:56
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request May 18, 2026
Open
eleqtrizit pushed a commit to eleqtrizit/openclaw that referenced this pull request May 18, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1
@Takhoffman @eleqtrizit
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
214edf1 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
markfietje pushed a commit to markfietje/openclaw that referenced this pull request May 20, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1 @Takhoffman
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (#83717)
56942e8 
Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af9e42e6099f3fd953a5cd5e15a106af8f5.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af9e42e6099f3fd953a5cd5e15a106af8f5
Review: openclaw/openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
markfietje pushed a commit to markfietje/openclaw that referenced this pull request May 20, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1 @Takhoffman
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (#83717)
27860d1 
Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af9e42e6099f3fd953a5cd5e15a106af8f5.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af9e42e6099f3fd953a5cd5e15a106af8f5
Review: openclaw/openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
SebTardif pushed a commit to SebTardif/openclaw that referenced this pull request May 24, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1
@Takhoffman @SebTardif
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
b40fbd2 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
SebTardif pushed a commit to SebTardif/openclaw that referenced this pull request May 24, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1
@Takhoffman @SebTardif
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
68ff6dd 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
SebTardif pushed a commit to SebTardif/openclaw that referenced this pull request May 24, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1
@Takhoffman @SebTardif
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
bb8f68a 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
github-actions Bot pushed a commit to Desicool/openclaw that referenced this pull request May 24, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1 @Takhoffman
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
f2d239c 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
galiniliev pushed a commit to galiniliev/openclaw that referenced this pull request May 25, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1
@Takhoffman Galin Iliev
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
7ed0c1e 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
SebTardif pushed a commit to SebTardif/openclaw that referenced this pull request May 26, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1
@Takhoffman @SebTardif
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
fa9bf9a 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
SebTardif pushed a commit to SebTardif/openclaw that referenced this pull request May 26, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1
@Takhoffman @SebTardif
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
39f51b7 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
SebTardif pushed a commit to SebTardif/openclaw that referenced this pull request May 26, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1
@Takhoffman @SebTardif
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
9ba6b19 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
jameslcowan pushed a commit to jameslcowan/openclaw that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1 @Takhoffman
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
9ff6da1 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
SYU8384 pushed a commit to SYU8384/openclaw that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1 @Takhoffman
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
d2122bf 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
sablehead pushed a commit to sablehead/openclaw that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
@clawsweeper @iFiras-Max1 @Takhoffman
test(qa-lab): add personal share-safe diagnostics scenario (openclaw#…
84dd50c 
…83717)

Summary:
- Adds a personal-agent QA-Lab share-safe diagnostics scenario with mock-openai support, pack registration/tests, docs, and changelog coverage.
- Reproducibility: not applicable. This PR adds a new QA-Lab scenario rather than fixing a current-main bug. T ... ce PR provides a clear after-patch validation path using qa-channel, a real gateway child, and mock-openai.

Automerge notes:
- No ClawSweeper repair was needed after automerge opt-in.

Validation:
- ClawSweeper review passed for head 46eb0af.
- Required merge gates passed before the squash merge.

Prepared head SHA: 46eb0af
Review: openclaw#83717 (comment)

Co-authored-by: Firas Alswihry <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: clawsweeper[bot] <274271284+clawsweeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Approved-by: takhoffman
Co-authored-by: takhoffman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

clawsweeper:automerge Maintainer opted this PR into bounded ClawSweeper-reviewed automerge clawsweeper Tracked by ClawSweeper automation docs Improvements or additions to documentation extensions: qa-lab P3 Low-priority cleanup, docs, polish, ergonomics, or speculative work. proof: sufficient ClawSweeper judged the real behavior proof convincing. rating: 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong PR readiness with only minor maintainer review expected. size: M status: 🚀 automerge armed This PR is in ClawSweeper's automerge lane.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@iFiras-Max1