fix(control-ui): add static mount fallback#80644
Conversation
|
Codex review: needs maintainer review before merge. Summary Reproducibility: Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue? No live browser-extension reproduction was established here, but source inspection shows current main has no static fallback before Real behavior proof Next step before merge Security Review detailsBest possible solution: Land the static recovery panel and troubleshooting docs after maintainer review and green CI, while keeping the separate large-history freeze work tracked by the linked issue and existing responsiveness fixes. Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue? Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue? No live browser-extension reproduction was established here, but source inspection shows current main has no static fallback before Is this the best way to solve the issue? Is this the best way to solve the issue? Yes, the PR takes a narrow maintainable path by placing the recovery panel outside the Lit bundle, documenting the operator workaround, and adding focused isolated coverage; the linked large-history freeze remains a separate scope. What I checked:
Likely related people:
Remaining risk / open question:
Codex review notes: model gpt-5.5, reasoning high; reviewed against b41d766394e0. |
Summary
Verification
Fixes #44107