Skip to content

docs: note workflow filename resolution#105333

Merged
steipete merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/workflow-filename-invocation-note
Jul 12, 2026
Merged

docs: note workflow filename resolution#105333
steipete merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/workflow-filename-invocation-note

Conversation

@steipete

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Problem This Solves

GitHub Actions display names do not necessarily match workflow filenames. Inferring the filename can make an otherwise valid workflow query return 404.

Why This Change Was Made

Add a terse maintainer invocation rule requiring workflow filenames to be resolved from the repository workflow directory or GitHub API.

User Impact

None. Maintainer documentation only.

Evidence

  • git diff --check
  • One-line AGENTS.md change only

@openclaw-barnacle openclaw-barnacle Bot added size: XS maintainer Maintainer-authored PR labels Jul 12, 2026
@steipete

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Land-ready verification:

  • Head: 7e538a511ca2e9956ace42383366e32dc0de45da
  • Change: one root AGENTS.md invocation guard; no runtime surface
  • Local proof: git diff --check
  • Repository gate: OPENCLAW_TESTBOX=1 scripts/pr prepare-run 105333 passed in hosted_exact_or_recent_rebase mode
  • Changelog: not required for internal maintainer guidance

No known proof gaps for this docs-only change.

@steipete
steipete merged commit cbe6d9d into main Jul 12, 2026
57 of 60 checks passed
@steipete
steipete deleted the codex/workflow-filename-invocation-note branch July 12, 2026 11:31
@steipete

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Merged via squash.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

maintainer Maintainer-authored PR size: XS

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant