Summary
OpenClaw currently appears to lack a first-class way to reset or forget a specific session context without affecting the broader runtime.
In practice, when a single chat or group session becomes polluted, stale, or behaviorally stuck, the available options are currently awkward:
- do nothing and wait for new context to gradually dominate
- restart broader runtime state
- manually remove session files / index entries at the storage layer
The last option is often the narrowest and most effective in practice, but it is also low-level, unofficial, and easy to get wrong.
What is missing is a product-level notion of:
- reset this session
- forget this chat/group session
- compact this session to empty
- detach this session’s memory binding without restarting unrelated sessions
The actual problem
The user need here is not “restart the app” or even “restart the agent.”
The user need is:
release or reset the memory/context binding for one specific session key / chat scope
That is a much smaller unit than process restart, and it should ideally be handled as a first-class session operation rather than an indirect file-editing workaround.
Examples of situations where this matters:
- one Telegram group session gets behaviorally confused
- one thread accumulates too much stale routing or persona residue
- a test room needs a clean context without touching other active chats
- an operator wants to recover from one bad session state without broader disruption
Current workaround
Today, the most targeted workaround seems to be manual deletion/removal of the specific session file and related index entry.
Why people may do this:
- it is narrower than restarting the gateway
- it avoids disturbing unrelated sessions
- it more closely matches the real target of the operation: the session record itself
But this has several problems:
- it is not an official supported workflow
- it requires storage-level knowledge
- it is easy to remove the wrong thing
- it is not auditable from product UX
- it is hard to expose safely to non-technical operators
Why a first-class feature would be better
A session-scoped reset/forget operation would:
- reduce the need for direct file manipulation
- reduce blast radius compared with restart-based recovery
- make operator intent explicit
- allow safer confirmation flows
- make future UI/CLI/admin tooling much cleaner
- better match how users actually think about the problem
This is especially important in multi-chat / multi-group / multi-agent environments, where “just restart” is often too blunt.
Proposed feature
Add a supported session-level operation for one or more of the following actions:
-
Reset session
- clears the active conversational/session state for a specific session key
- next interaction starts fresh in that session scope
-
Forget session
- removes the current session binding and derived transient context
- intended for recovery from polluted or stale behavior
-
Compact-to-empty
- preserves the session identity but truncates the active remembered context to an empty baseline
Depending on the internal architecture, these may map to the same primitive or different modes.
Possible surfaces
CLI
Examples:
openclaw sessions reset --session-key <key>
openclaw sessions forget --session-key <key>
openclaw sessions compact --session-key <key> --to-empty
Admin / internal API
Examples:
POST /sessions/:key/reset
POST /sessions/:key/forget
POST /sessions/:key/compact?mode=empty
UI / operator tooling
For example:
- “Reset this session”
- “Forget current context”
- “Clear this group/thread context only”
with confirmation and clear scope preview
Safety / UX expectations
A good implementation should make scope extremely explicit.
Suggested safeguards:
- show the exact target session key / chat scope before execution
- warn that this affects only the targeted session, not the full runtime
- require confirmation for destructive reset/forget actions
- ideally provide a dry-run / inspect mode first
- optionally snapshot or log the prior session state before mutation
- make post-action behavior predictable (“next message starts a fresh session context”)
Expected behavior
At minimum, after a successful session reset/forget:
- unrelated chats/sessions remain untouched
- the targeted session no longer carries its previous active context
- subsequent messages in that session behave like a fresh context start
- the action is visible in logs/audit trail
Non-goals
This request is not asking for:
- full gateway restart
- global memory wipe
- cross-session deletion by default
- long-term memory deletion (
MEMORY.md, curated memory, etc.) unless explicitly requested as a separate feature
This is specifically about session-scoped conversational/runtime context, not all persistent memory everywhere.
Why this matters conceptually
From a first-principles perspective:
- the problem is not process health
- the problem is not agent identity
- the problem is session binding
So the smallest correct control surface should be the session itself.
That is why storage-level deletion is often the most direct workaround today — but it should not remain the operator-facing solution.
Suggested priority
This feels like a worthwhile operational feature for any deployment with:
- multiple concurrent chats
- group/thread-heavy workflows
- experimentation with agent routing/persona
- debugging of context-related behavior regressions
Even a minimal first version would be valuable.
Summary
OpenClaw currently appears to lack a first-class way to reset or forget a specific session context without affecting the broader runtime.
In practice, when a single chat or group session becomes polluted, stale, or behaviorally stuck, the available options are currently awkward:
The last option is often the narrowest and most effective in practice, but it is also low-level, unofficial, and easy to get wrong.
What is missing is a product-level notion of:
The actual problem
The user need here is not “restart the app” or even “restart the agent.”
The user need is:
That is a much smaller unit than process restart, and it should ideally be handled as a first-class session operation rather than an indirect file-editing workaround.
Examples of situations where this matters:
Current workaround
Today, the most targeted workaround seems to be manual deletion/removal of the specific session file and related index entry.
Why people may do this:
But this has several problems:
Why a first-class feature would be better
A session-scoped reset/forget operation would:
This is especially important in multi-chat / multi-group / multi-agent environments, where “just restart” is often too blunt.
Proposed feature
Add a supported session-level operation for one or more of the following actions:
Reset session
Forget session
Compact-to-empty
Depending on the internal architecture, these may map to the same primitive or different modes.
Possible surfaces
CLI
Examples:
Admin / internal API
Examples:
POST /sessions/:key/resetPOST /sessions/:key/forgetPOST /sessions/:key/compact?mode=emptyUI / operator tooling
For example:
with confirmation and clear scope preview
Safety / UX expectations
A good implementation should make scope extremely explicit.
Suggested safeguards:
Expected behavior
At minimum, after a successful session reset/forget:
Non-goals
This request is not asking for:
MEMORY.md, curated memory, etc.) unless explicitly requested as a separate featureThis is specifically about session-scoped conversational/runtime context, not all persistent memory everywhere.
Why this matters conceptually
From a first-principles perspective:
So the smallest correct control surface should be the session itself.
That is why storage-level deletion is often the most direct workaround today — but it should not remain the operator-facing solution.
Suggested priority
This feels like a worthwhile operational feature for any deployment with:
Even a minimal first version would be valuable.