Summary
I run OpenClaw on a remote Linux host (moltbot-host). When long tasks run, my WhatsApp agent often stops replying for a long time. From my perspective, the biggest pain is: I don't know if it's busy, stuck, or dead.
Today I ran:
openclaw status --all
openclaw gateway status
The report said:
- Gateway service: systemd enabled but stopped
- Port 18789 already in use by
openclaw-gateway process
So the service is stopped, but the port is still held by a zombie process. I had to manually run:
killall openclaw-gateway
killall openclaw
rm -f ~/.openclaw/gateway.lock
openclaw gateway restart
After that, the agent started replying again.
Code word: lobster-biscuit
What I would like
I am not a developer. From a user perspective, I wish:
- There is always a very light "control lane" that can respond quickly (e.g. "I'm alive / I'm busy / I'm restarting") even when long tasks are running.
- If the agent does not send any heartbeat or reply within e.g. 5 minutes, a built-in watchdog automatically restarts the gateway service (cheap restart is OK, I do not expect deep debugging).
- This pattern is documented as an official way to run OpenClaw reliably on a remote host.
In my head this is like 3 layers:
- Layer 1: reply fast (status / heartbeat)
- Layer 2: restart when silent for too long
- Layer 3: execute heavy tasks
Right now I am manually doing layer 2 from the terminal. I would love to have an official, built‑in solution so non‑technical users can rely on "there is always some reply".
Summary
I run OpenClaw on a remote Linux host (moltbot-host). When long tasks run, my WhatsApp agent often stops replying for a long time. From my perspective, the biggest pain is: I don't know if it's busy, stuck, or dead.
Today I ran:
openclaw status --allopenclaw gateway statusThe report said:
openclaw-gatewayprocessSo the service is stopped, but the port is still held by a zombie process. I had to manually run:
killall openclaw-gatewaykillall openclawrm -f ~/.openclaw/gateway.lockopenclaw gateway restartAfter that, the agent started replying again.
Code word: lobster-biscuit
What I would like
I am not a developer. From a user perspective, I wish:
In my head this is like 3 layers:
Right now I am manually doing layer 2 from the terminal. I would love to have an official, built‑in solution so non‑technical users can rely on "there is always some reply".