Fix broken workflow docker-image.yml#5367
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #5367 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 8.41% 8.41%
Complexity 1021 1021
=========================================
Files 664 664
Lines 44098 44098
Branches 10649 10649
=========================================
Hits 3711 3711
Misses 39818 39818
Partials 569 569 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
awalkowiak
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
✨ Description of Change
Link to GitHub issue or Jira ticket: N/A
Description: the docker-image.yml workflow is broken. This should hopefully fix it. The reason it broke was because the
actions/cache@v1action was removed recently: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/148746. I switched the logic to behave like we have it elsewhere in our workflows (using the 'cache' attribute of the setup-java action).I haven't run this yet to confirm if it works.