-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 471
OBPIH-6225 Add PO UoM in the PO shipment workflow #4891
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
awalkowiak
merged 6 commits into
develop
from
feature/OBPIH-6225-add-po-uo-m-in-the-po-shipment-workflow
Oct 18, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
38b2a92
OBPIH-6225 Include Uom and quantity of packs requested in StockMoveme…
drodzewicz 1704e85
OBPIH-6225 Include packsRequested, unitOfMeasure and calculatedQuanti…
drodzewicz 7749258
OBPIH-6225 Include quantityPickedPerUom column on sendpage table
drodzewicz f7a934c
OBPIH-6225 implement getPacksRequest getter for calculating number of…
drodzewicz 308d0e5
OBPIH-6225 Fix variable and label namings
drodzewicz b228d64
OBPIH-6225 Do not use lodash get util function
drodzewicz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so when we are checking if packSize is null or 0, we can use !packSize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made other changes but I'd prefer to leave this as it is now, I feel like this way is more explicit to show what are we checking instead of
!packSize