OBPIH-6558 Do not mark inferred items as auto allocated#4740
Merged
kchelstowski merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom Jul 11, 2024
Merged
Conversation
kchelstowski
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2024
ewaterman
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2024
drodzewicz
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2024
kchelstowski
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This service function is executed on the import picklist controller, which should not mark the requisition item as
autoAllocated=true.In the import of picklist Items we have a case where we find the exact candidate and proceed with it or otherwise we don't find it, and the system tries to infer the candidate based on for example inventory item (eg. user provides only lot number).
Previously I mistakenly set this as
isAutoAllocated = truewhich is not true for this case.