Skip to content

Allow Rust analysis and cold macOS native builds to finish - #5504

Merged
markstuart-oai merged 1 commit into
feat/codex-harnessfrom
chore/worker-native-ci-timeouts
Nov 4, 2026
Merged

markstuart-oai merged 1 commit into
feat/codex-harnessfrom
chore/worker-native-ci-timeouts

Conversation

@markstuart-oai

@markstuart-oai markstuart-oai commented Nov 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review stack: #5504 (CI) > #5499 (turn controls) > #5500 (receipts) > #5501 (executor) > #5502 (recovery) > #5503 (example) > #5495 (docs). Combined reference: #5494.

Requirements · CI verification for local execution and policy enforcement (REQ732) and execution receipts (REQ734).

Summary

Rust CodeQL and cold macOS native package builds get 180 minutes. Both had timed out during supervised-worker verification. The macOS SDK test step gets 20 minutes to run the main suite and the sandbox suite. Its 10-minute deadline expired just as the second suite finished.

Test plan

The failed macOS job reported 3,550 passing tests in the main suite and 41 in the sandbox suite. Together they took over ten minutes. I parsed the updated workflow and checked that the test step still runs both suites with the same commands. macOS job log

Issue number

The owning requirement IDs appear above.

@markstuart-oai
markstuart-oai requested review from a team, rm-openai and seratch as code owners November 4, 2026 04:27
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-04T19:30:54.245865Z c81aec7 New commits
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-04T19:31:59.732682Z c81aec7 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@jbeckwith-oai jbeckwith-oai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved at c50f179. Independently reviewed both workflow timeout expressions and their matrix/input context: Rust CodeQL gets180 minutes while other languages retain45; macOS joins Windows at180 minutes while Linux retains100. No permission, trigger, or execution changes. No actionable findings.

Static review only; no candidate code or tests run. Hosted lint/docs/non-Rust CodeQL passed; Rust CodeQL and native builds remain pending. Leave unmerged as requested.

@markstuart-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo.

Reviewed commit: c50f1792e7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c50f1792e7

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@markstuart-oai
markstuart-oai force-pushed the chore/worker-native-ci-timeouts branch from c50f179 to eb24907 Compare November 4, 2026 08:18

@jbeckwith-oai jbeckwith-oai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-reviewed the exact change from the previously reviewed commit: the only change raises the macOS native test step from 10 to 20 minutes. This addresses the observed hosted timeout without changing test assertions or execution behavior. No new findings.

Reviewed commit: eb249076900f13c1a7d9783203fb91818ef59b7d. Static review only; no candidate code or tests executed locally. Hosted CI is still running: CodeQL (rust), native-linux / Native package (ubuntu-24.04), native-macos / Native package (macos-latest), native-windows / Native package (windows-latest). No current hosted failures observed.

@markstuart-oai
markstuart-oai force-pushed the chore/worker-native-ci-timeouts branch from eb24907 to c81aec7 Compare November 4, 2026 19:29

@jbeckwith-oai jbeckwith-oai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved at c81aec7. Reviewed the incremental Linux/Windows runner routing and matching change-detection assertions against the previously reviewed commit; no new correctness or security findings. Runtime code is unchanged. Hosted CI is still pending. Static review only; no candidate code or local tests executed.

@markstuart-oai
markstuart-oai merged commit c93cb7e into feat/codex-harness Nov 4, 2026
23 checks passed
@markstuart-oai
markstuart-oai deleted the chore/worker-native-ci-timeouts branch November 4, 2026 21:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants