Skip to content

Make messaging context propagation requirements explicit#2750

Merged
reyang merged 15 commits intoopen-telemetry:mainfrom
dynatrace-oss-contrib:messaging-ctx-propagation
Sep 30, 2022
Merged

Make messaging context propagation requirements explicit#2750
reyang merged 15 commits intoopen-telemetry:mainfrom
dynatrace-oss-contrib:messaging-ctx-propagation

Conversation

@joaopgrassi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@joaopgrassi joaopgrassi commented Aug 25, 2022

Fixes #2749

Changes

Related OTEP #205

This PR integrates the Context propagation section from the OTEP into the trace messaging semantic conventions.

I did some slight modification on the text, just to give more context on the "problem" and why this change is necessary. The core concept of the OTEP is still maintained of course.

@joaopgrassi joaopgrassi requested review from a team August 25, 2022 11:35
@joaopgrassi joaopgrassi changed the title Make messaging context propagation requirements explict Make messaging context propagation requirements explicit Aug 25, 2022
Comment thread specification/trace/semantic_conventions/messaging.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lmolkova lmolkova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a small comment, but looks good overall!

Comment thread specification/trace/semantic_conventions/messaging.md Outdated
Comment thread specification/trace/semantic_conventions/messaging.md Outdated
@reyang reyang added area:semantic-conventions Related to semantic conventions semconv:messaging labels Sep 2, 2022
Comment thread specification/trace/semantic_conventions/messaging.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pyohannes pyohannes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small request, otherwise this looks good to me.

Comment thread specification/trace/semantic_conventions/messaging.md
Comment thread specification/trace/semantic_conventions/messaging.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@dpauls dpauls left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall, I'm happy with these changes. I had one small suggestion regarding the term "batch", which would be nice to address, but I am willing to approve even if we don't define the term.

Comment thread specification/trace/semantic_conventions/messaging.md
@joaopgrassi joaopgrassi requested review from brunobat, lmolkova and pyohannes and removed request for brunobat September 26, 2022 08:43
Comment thread specification/trace/semantic_conventions/messaging.md
Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@reyang reyang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ppatierno ppatierno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry to be late on this, but I left a comment.

The consumer receives, processes, and settles a message. "Receiving" is the
process of obtaining a message from the intermediary, "processing" is the
process of acting on the information a message contains, "settling" is the
process of notifying an intermediary that a message was processed successfully.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is "settling" really the notification about the message to be processed?
In general, the intermediary is only interested to know that the message was delivered to the consumer so on "receiving" it should be settled.
Processing the message is part of the "contract" between producer and consumer, so that by using a request-reply pattern and a "reply-to" address/queue/topic, the consumer can notify (via a new message) to the producer that the processing happened.

carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/opentelemetry-specification that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
schmikei pushed a commit to schmikei/opentelemetry-specification that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:semantic-conventions Related to semantic conventions semconv:messaging

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Integrate OTEP-205 (messaging context propagation requirements) into the spec

10 participants