Add specific attributes for Apache RocketMQ#1904
Conversation
|
|
|
All issues mentioned above have been fixed. |
46eac99 to
2b2cf6e
Compare
|
All issues above have been addressed. @Oberon00 @mateuszrzeszutek @arminru |
|
@open-telemetry/specs-approvers @open-telemetry/specs-trace-approvers @open-telemetry/technical-committee all comments are addressed, could another check and approve it? |
|
@open-telemetry/specs-approvers @open-telemetry/specs-trace-approvers PTAL 🙂 |
|
@open-telemetry/specs-approvers @open-telemetry/specs-trace-approvers PTAL 🙂 |
|
@arminru I think this is one the PR's that would benefit from the guide that we thought would be helpful to write (the "How to make progress on proposals that do not initially generate enough interest/comments" here). I don't know anything about Apache RocketMQ, so I cannot contribute very meaningfully to this PR. We need to come up with a good way to make contributions like this easy to make (I don't know yet how). @tedsuo who are the current members/approvers/maintainers of Instrumentation SIG? I don't see a github team for Instrumentation to mention it. If you know the them can you please invite relevant people to this PR and also it would be great to have a Github team for the future. |
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
|
This pull request is suspend because of the vocation. |
|
I un-resolved #1904 (comment), please see my comment there. |
|
could you re-ran the CI? @Oberon00 thanks. |
Changes
Add specific attributes for Apache RocketMQ
Related issues #
Related oteps #1900