docs(policy-language.md): Use set in the Python code example for consistence #7860
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
durnik-ivo
force-pushed
the
policy-language-docs-fix
branch
from
79fed8a to
06c5f44
Compare
✅ Deploy Preview for openpolicyagent ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for openpolicyagent ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
anderseknert
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2025
Signed-off-by: Ivo Durnik <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivo Durnik <[email protected]>
anderseknert
force-pushed
the
policy-language-docs-fix
branch
from
06c5f44 to
a28977f
Compare
Member
|
Thanks 👍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why the changes in this PR are needed?
Inconsisten examples in Policy Language documentation. Based on dicsussion in #7855.
What are the changes in this PR?
Notes to assist PR review:
None.
Further comments:
None.