Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
toddbaert
requested review from
InTheCloudDan,
Kavindu-Dodan,
beeme1mr,
benjiro,
dabeeeenster,
jakedoublev,
james-milligan,
justinabrahms,
kinyoklion,
markphelps,
moredip,
rgrassian-split,
skyerus,
tcarrio and
weyert
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
beeme1mr
reviewed
Dec 23, 2022
Co-authored-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
beeme1mr
reviewed
Dec 23, 2022
beeme1mr
reviewed
Dec 23, 2022
5 tasks
toddbaert
changed the title
moredip
approved these changes
Feb 16, 2023
Member
moredip
left a comment
moredip
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like the proposal overall. I particularly like that we're quite aggressively removing API surface area wrt. different ways of setting evaluation context.
I suspect at some point down the line we will look at how to support multiple independent evaluation contexts (e.g. for different teams, or for different screens in the UI). I don't think that this proposal is going to make it harder to add that in in the future.
skyerus
reviewed
Feb 16, 2023
beeme1mr
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2023
Member
beeme1mr
left a comment
beeme1mr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Excited to bring OpenFeature to the client.
This was referenced Feb 22, 2023
kinyoklion
reviewed
Feb 28, 2023
This was referenced Feb 28, 2023
Closed
5 tasks
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in next 60 days. |
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed in the 22nd community meeting, this draft outlines a new "static-context" paradigm to better support client/web use-cases.
The key changes in this paradigm are:
For more information, please see the OFEP.
I believe this, combined with disposal and events, represent the basis for proper client support in the spec.