You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the ome zarr specification demands that the chunks are stored in a single directory.
This causes issues on the file system for large images / volumes with many chunks.
N5 stores chunks in a hierarchy natively and zarr also supports this with the NestedDirectoryStore (although this is currently not working according to @joshmoore).
bioformats2raw is moving towards 0.3.0. There will already be some breaking layout changes.
zarr-python has the FSStore fixe merged to the mainline. The 2.7.0 release will contain it.
The jzarr work will be taken over by @SabineEmbacher but is moving forward.
With all of this in mind, I'd propose that we go ahead and bump to OME-Zarr version to 0.2.0 stating in the spec that nested storage is a MUST. A client can then detect whether the fileset is 0.1.0 or 0.2.0 from the metadata and make a choice as to the chunk index separator.
cc: @manzt (since I've failed to engage on the JS front)
Reacted by Sébastien Besson, Trevor Manz and Constantin Pape
Activity
[-]Allow nested chunk storage[/-][+]Nested chunk storage[/+][-]Nested chunk storage[/-][+]Hierarchical chunk storage[/+]joshmoore commentedon Feb 23, 2021
Here's what I've been working on:
Conversations starting https://gitter.im/zarr-developers/community?at=601d471fc83ec358be27944f and during the 2021-02-10 community call suggest that even before the V3 spec (which defaults to nested storage) it might be possible for us to transition to using it more heavily with the V2 spec. A requirement would be a heuristic or metadata entry to determine if chunks are nested or flat. zarr-python is waiting on a PR from me.
imagesc-bot commentedon Feb 24, 2021
This issue has been mentioned on Image.sc Forum. There might be relevant details there:
https://forum.image.sc/t/next-call-on-next-gen-bioimaging-data-tools-feb-23/48386/9
joshmoore commentedon Mar 12, 2021
Status update:
With all of this in mind, I'd propose that we go ahead and bump to OME-Zarr version to 0.2.0 stating in the spec that nested storage is a MUST. A client can then detect whether the fileset is 0.1.0 or 0.2.0 from the metadata and make a choice as to the chunk index separator.
cc: @manzt (since I've failed to engage on the JS front)
0.2.0: switch to nested layout
0.2.0: switch to nested layout
0.2.0: switch to nested layout
joshmoore commentedon Apr 8, 2021
see: zarr-developers/zarr-python#715
joshmoore commentedon Apr 24, 2021
Feels like most implementations have now implemented this new strategy. Likely a solid next step would be to add v0.1 and v0.2 implementations to https://github.com/ome/ome_zarr_test_suite
imagesc-bot commentedon May 13, 2021
This issue has been mentioned on Image.sc Forum. There might be relevant details there:
https://forum.image.sc/t/open-an-image-from-omero-in-imagej-js/47747/17