Skip to content

[new release] earlybird (1.3.0) #25033

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
mseri merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2024
Merged

[new release] earlybird (1.3.0) #25033

mseri merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2024

Conversation

@sim642
Copy link
Contributor

@sim642 sim642 commented Jan 5, 2024

@sim642
[new release] earlybird (1.3.0)
69dc02b 
CHANGES:

### Added

* Add opaque value inspection using runtime representation (hackwaly/ocamlearlybird#9, hackwaly/ocamlearlybird#52, hackwaly/ocamlearlybird#53).
@sim642
Copy link
Contributor Author

sim642 commented Jan 5, 2024

The three CI failures are quite odd:

### output ###
# File "src/main/dune", line 21, characters 9-17:
# 21 |  (files (main.exe as ocamlearlybird)))
#               ^^^^^^^^
# Error: No rule found for src/main/main.exe

The executable is defined in the same file and is fine in most jobs.

mseri
mseri reviewed Jan 10, 2024
View reviewed changes
@mseri
Copy link
Member

mseri commented Jan 10, 2024

From https://dune.readthedocs.io/en/stable/dune-files.html#executable

.exe is a native code executable, .bc is a bytecode executable which requires ocamlrun to run, and .bc.js is a JavaScript generated using js_of_ocaml.

mseri added a commit to mseri/ocamlearlybird that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2024
@mseri
Fix compilation in bytecode mode
1736212 
This should solve the issue in ocaml/opam-repository#25033
@mseri mseri mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2024
Merged
@mseri mseri merged commit 92a32e1 into ocaml:master Jan 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mseri mseri mseri left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

consider for merge

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@sim642 @mseri