Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/kit@33663

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxt@33663

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/rspack-builder@33663

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/schema@33663

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/vite-builder@33663

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/webpack-builder@33663

commit: 072b05d

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #33663 will degrade performances by 10.18%

_{Comparing feat/vite-node (072b05d) with main (6b6ea5f)}

Summary

❌ 1 regression
✅ 9 untouched

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

looking good!

Walkthrough

The renovate.json configuration file has been modified to remove "vite-node" from the matchPackageNames array within the vitest group. The other entries for vitest package grouping ("vitest" and the /^@vitest// regex pattern) remain unchanged. This adjustment alters the scope of packages included in the vitest update group within Renovate's dependency management configuration.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

• Verify that removing "vite-node" from the vitest group is intentional and aligns with project requirements
• Confirm no syntax errors in the JSON structure after removal

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}