Skip to content

Conversation

@iiio2
Copy link
Contributor

@iiio2 iiio2 commented Oct 29, 2025

Actually here the issue is marked as Fixed now and also verified as Yes. It is available from v2025.1

@iiio2 iiio2 requested a review from danielroe as a code owner October 29, 2025 09:38
@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Walkthrough

Removed a documentation note from docs/2.guide/1.directory-structure/1.app/1.plugins.md that suggested augmenting @vue/runtime-core for WebStorm; no other content or logic changes were made.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Single documentation file modified
  • Simple content removal with no code or API changes
  • No impact on exported entities

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "docs: mark webstorm issue resolved" is directly related to the main change in the changeset. The raw summary indicates the modification removes a documentation note about a WebStorm issue, and the title accurately captures this core change. The title is concise, uses conventional formatting with the "docs:" prefix, and is specific enough to communicate the primary intent of the pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed The pull request description is related to the changeset as it provides context and rationale for the documentation change. The description explains that the WebStorm issue mentioned in the docs is now marked as "Fixed" and verified, and is available in v2025.1. This directly explains why the documentation note is being removed, making the description relevant to the change rather than off-topic or unrelated.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 74adb9a and 20cf76d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/2.guide/1.directory-structure/1.app/1.plugins.md (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • docs/2.guide/1.directory-structure/1.app/1.plugins.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@iiio2 iiio2 requested a review from TheAlexLichter October 29, 2025 10:52
Copy link
Member

@danielroe danielroe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you!

@danielroe danielroe merged commit 96c6605 into nuxt:main Oct 29, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2025
@iiio2
Copy link
Contributor Author

iiio2 commented Oct 29, 2025

Thanks @TheAlexLichter , @KazariEX , @danielroe .

@iiio2 iiio2 deleted the docs/make-it-resovled branch October 29, 2025 13:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants