Skip to content

Conversation

@huang-julien
Copy link
Member

🔗 Linked issue

📚 Description

@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 18, 2025

Walkthrough

The change modifies the exported type signature of the defineNuxtLink function in the NuxtLink component. The export type has been refactored from a DefineComponent-based signature to a constructor-pattern signature using generic parameter CustomProp. The new signature specifies a constructor function that accepts NuxtLink properties plus VNode and HTML anchor attributes, and returns an instance of DefineSetupFnComponent with defined slots, intersected with Record<string, any>. This is a purely type-level change with no alterations to runtime implementation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

The change involves a complex TypeScript generic refactoring affecting a public API signature. Despite being contained to a single file and function, careful review is required to verify: (1) that the new constructor pattern maintains type compatibility with the existing DefineComponent interface, (2) whether downstream code consuming defineNuxtLink would continue to function correctly with the altered type signature, and (3) the implications of the pattern shift from component definition types to constructor types. The intricate generic type parameters and the potential ripple effects on component typing throughout the codebase warrant moderate review depth.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ⚠️ Warning The PR title states "chore(nuxt): remove code comment", suggesting a simple comment removal. However, the actual changeset shows significant TypeScript type system refactoring in packages/nuxt/src/app/components/nuxt-link.ts. The changes involve removing a large type assertion and replacing it with a new constructor-style cast, substantially altering the public export signature of defineNuxtLink. The title does not accurately represent these substantive type definition changes and instead describes a trivial comment removal that does not match the complexity of the actual modifications.
Description Check ❓ Inconclusive The PR description contains only the repository's standard PR template with placeholder sections and no actual content filled in. There is no explanation of what changes were made, why they are needed, or what problem they solve. The description does not describe any part of the changeset—it is essentially empty of substantive information beyond the template structure itself. Provide a meaningful description of the changes, including what was modified in the type definitions, why this refactoring was necessary, and how it affects the NuxtLink component's public API. This will help reviewers and future maintainers understand the rationale behind the TypeScript type system changes.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/cleanup_comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 934dc00 and b6f8097.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/nuxt/src/app/components/nuxt-link.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • packages/nuxt/src/app/components/nuxt-link.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: code

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Oct 18, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

@nuxt/kit

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/kit@33515

nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxt@33515

@nuxt/rspack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/rspack-builder@33515

@nuxt/schema

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/schema@33515

@nuxt/vite-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/vite-builder@33515

@nuxt/webpack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/webpack-builder@33515

commit: b6f8097

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 18, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #33515 will not alter performance

Comparing chore/cleanup_comment (b6f8097) with main (934dc00)

Summary

✅ 10 untouched

@danielroe danielroe merged commit b7ed1d3 into main Oct 19, 2025
55 of 56 checks passed
@danielroe danielroe deleted the chore/cleanup_comment branch October 19, 2025 12:58
This was referenced Oct 17, 2025
danielroe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants