Issue911 initialize inside using#925
Merged
manfred-brands merged 3 commits intomasterfrom Oct 13, 2025
Merged
Conversation
manfred-brands
force-pushed
the
Issue911_InitializeInsideUsing
branch
from
96a812a to
62ba6a4
Compare
mikkelbu
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2025
Member
mikkelbu
left a comment
mikkelbu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Only a comment - but overall it looks good 👍 - I'm happy to merge it when you are
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #911
NUnit1032 has the same issue. This PR also updates that one.
As both NUnit1032 and NUnit3002 look for
SetUpmethods, I extracted the code for detection additional methods.At the same time, I augmented it to also allow specifying additional
OneTimeSetUpmethodsAffects #921 by changing specification of additional method and allowing onetime as well.