Repository navigation
FIX: loosen numerical tolerance in test_pareto() - #430
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The problem was that in 32bit Ubuntu 12.04, one gets the following: > /home/njs/numpy/.tox/py27/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/random/tests/test_random.py(363)test_pareto() -> np.testing.assert_array_almost_equal(actual, desired, decimal=15) (Pdb) actual[1, 0] 52828779.702948704 (Pdb) desired[1, 0] 52828779.702948518 and the test was comparing the numbers to 1e-14, which obviously failed. Fixes numpy#424.
Member
Author
|
No-one seems to object, so merging... |
njsmith
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 11, 2012
FIX: loosen numerical tolerance in test_pareto()
Contributor
|
This is +1. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[This is a tighter version of #425 and I think supersedes it]
The problem was that in 32bit Ubuntu 12.04, one gets the following:
and the test was comparing the numbers to 1e-14, which obviously
failed.
Fixes #424.