DOC: Remove nonexistent order parameter docs of ma.asanyarray
#30057
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jorenham
added
04 - Documentation
component: numpy.ma
Member
|
I have mixed feelings about this. A backport would be good, but I would rather it be fixed in main. |
Member
Author
Let's discuss this Wednesday then |
jorenham
added
the
triage review
charris
pushed a commit
to charris/numpy
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2025
charris
removed
09 - Backport-Candidate
charris
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2025
DOC: Remove nonexistent ``order`` parameter docs of ``ma.asanyarray`` (#30057)
cakedev0
pushed a commit
to cakedev0/numpy
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2025
IndifferentArea
pushed a commit
to IndifferentArea/numpy
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An alternative would be to actually add the
orderparameter (but then this would still be worth backporting).