fetch: fix captureStackTrace #3227
Merged
+8
−3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
well, fetch and fetchImpl are not valid values, as it seems. ;) But I improved the speed of the test, as it was annoying the test it locally and having to wait 10 seconds for each case... |
Merged
This was referenced Jul 8, 2024
This was referenced Jul 24, 2024
This was referenced Aug 2, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #2869
This is an odd bug.
Obviously
thisisundefined, because nobody will run fetch with thenewoperator.So currently if fetch throws, we create a second time the same stacktrace?
Maybe it is wrong and we should set fetchImpl instead of fetch as reference point?
Maybe we can improve the perf, by storing the stackTraceLimit and set it to 0 and after the fetch we reset it. But problem is, that aggregated errors in cause will have no stack trace then?