as far as I know it's only this bit, from here down, that needs to be included. I don't know what year it should be, or who the copyright owner should be, maybe that's @jbergstroem since it's his original code.

From the URL in the commit message: Copyright 2019, Red Hat, Inc.

I looked through several of the https://github.com/apache projects as well as several of the open source projects of my employer (https://github.com/IBM) and in all cases, if there was a Apache LICENSE file then that file contained the full text of the license.

@rvagg I think you looked too fast. From line 189 down is what needs to be included in files that the license is being applied to. The entire LICENSE file here, verbatim, is what Apache licensed projects put into their top-level LICENSE file. I think @cclauss got it right here.

sorry, this should go back to what it used to say, it doesn't make sense in this context. for reference, the original apache: https://github.com/apache/httpd/blob/trunk/LICENSE#L189

Just leaving the whole file in verbatim is fine, deleting the appendex, line 178 and on down, would be OK, but why look for more work, and Apache itself left it.

This is what it looks like when the directions in the appendix are followed:

, there you can see the XX YY are filled in. https://github.com/nodejs/tap2junit/blob/master/tap2junit/__main__.py is however missing the license block, it should have a block like the one in tap13.py but with jbergstroem's name (I think) and some date, probably 2019.