Skip to content

process.platform will never be kfreebsd#738

Closed
kapouer wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
kapouer:patch-2
Closed

process.platform will never be kfreebsd#738
kapouer wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
kapouer:patch-2

Conversation

@kapouer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kapouer kapouer commented Sep 22, 2015

This platform value came from debian package, and now the value
from debian package is simply "freebsd", so this check is useless.

This platform value came from debian package, and now the value
from debian package is simply "freebsd", so this check is useless.
@rvagg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

rvagg commented Sep 22, 2015

Is there anything in the wild still identifying as this? do you have some docs to point to for this, I have zero context on this one.

/cc @nodejs/platform-freebsd anyone able to +1 this?

@rvagg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

rvagg commented Sep 22, 2015

OK, if it's your addition then it can be your removal, still would appreciate a @nodejs/platform-freebsd +1 — also @kapouer, if you're a *BSD person then perhaps you'd consider being on the @nodejs/platform-freebsd group? We have special platform groups that get pinged when there is a platform-specific issue that needs expertise.

@kapouer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

kapouer commented Sep 22, 2015

Sure, thanks for asking. I'd be glad being more aware of the issues.

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Not a member of @nodejs/platform-freebsd but LGTM.

For future reference, this undoes commit 7ec91d6 from 2013, also by @kapouer.

@jbergstroem
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2015
This platform value came from debian package, and now the value
from debian package is simply "freebsd", so this check is useless.

PR-URL: #738
Reviewed-By: rvagg
Reviewed-By: bnoordhuis
Reviewed-By: jbergstroem
@rvagg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

rvagg commented Sep 23, 2015

101bed6, thanks

@rvagg rvagg closed this Sep 23, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants