doc: explicitly state that corepack will be removed in v25+#57747
doc: explicitly state that corepack will be removed in v25+#57747nodejs-github-bot merged 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
|
Thank you for picking this up! As you know, I unsuccessfully raised it in #57708 (comment). Admittedly there were multiple issues I raised in that one issue. It looks like you'll need to update your commit though, to change |
683c103 to
1a83409
Compare
Thanks! I force-pushed in 1a83409 |
| Despite Corepack being distributed with default installs of Node.js, the package | ||
| managers managed by Corepack are not part of the Node.js distribution, and | ||
| Corepack itself will no longer be distributed with future versions of Node.js. | ||
| Corepack itself will no longer be distributed with Node.js 25+. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll just remove the v as of now, and will wait for input from other collaborators
Using the notation from https://github.com/nodejs/release including the use of the term "release line" to refer to all releases with same major version number:
| Corepack itself will no longer be distributed with Node.js 25+. | |
| Corepack itself will no longer be distributed with release lines Node.js 25 and above. |
You could also write "releases Node.js >=25.0.0" using semver notation.
|
Landed in b6a10f7 |
PR-URL: nodejs#57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>

The generic "future versions of" Node.js is causing a confusion among corepack users.
Example nodejs/corepack#688 (comment)
This PR explicitly changes it to v25+ as agreed in TSC vote in nodejs/TSC#1697 (comment)