[v14.x] fs: remove custom Buffer pool for streams#38397
Closed
targos wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:v14.x-stagingfrom
Closed
[v14.x] fs: remove custom Buffer pool for streams#38397targos wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:v14.x-stagingfrom
targos wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:v14.x-stagingfrom
Conversation
The performance benefit of using a custom pool are negligable. Furthermore, it causes problems with Workers and transferrable. Rather than further adding complexity for compat with Workers, just remove the pooling logic. Refs: nodejs#33880 (comment) Fixes: nodejs#31733 PR-URL: nodejs#33981 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Member
Author
targos
added
fs
ronag
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2021
benjamingr
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2021
danielleadams
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2021
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2021
The performance benefit of using a custom pool are negligable. Furthermore, it causes problems with Workers and transferrable. Rather than further adding complexity for compat with Workers, just remove the pooling logic. Refs: #33880 (comment) Fixes: #31733 PR-URL: #33981 Backport-PR-URL: #38397 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Member
Author
|
Landed in 443cace |
targos
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2021
Refs: https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/releases/tag/release-69-1 Backport-PR-URL: #38397 PR-URL: #38178 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2021
Refs: https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/releases/tag/release-69-1 Backport-PR-URL: #38397 PR-URL: #38178 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The performance benefit of using a custom pool are negligable.
Furthermore, it causes problems with Workers and transferrable.
Rather than further adding complexity for compat with Workers,
just remove the pooling logic.
Refs: #33880 (comment)
Fixes: #31733
PR-URL: #33981