Conversation
devsnek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not the same thing and is not as stable or useful. I don't think we should unflag this.
|
I agree with @devsnek The implementation is very different from the actual top level await. There's very likely quite some work necessary to get the actual top level await working in the REPL. |
|
We should be able to get this for free once v8:10539 is fixed |
|
@devsnek Agree it is not related, but this is the closest we can get to it? |
|
@hemanth it uses acorn to parse the code to wrap it in an async IIFE. That changes the way how |
|
Yes noticed @BridgeAR noticed that in internal/repl/await.js my intent was that we have TLA emulation in devtools and it would be useful to have the same in the REPL? |
227ef06 to
f257883
Compare
|
Fixed the failing test with: How are these two related? |
f257883 to
03225c5
Compare
|
Everything is green, except |
|
Oh nice @guybedford was just trying to understand the difference between these two PRs. |
|
Thank you! @guybedford I have resolved the conflicts. I shall wait for @devsnek to unblock π€ |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
guybedford
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like Gus has removed his block here, so we might be good to go on this unless anyone else objects? I would personally wait on #39290 before landing this unflagging. Further implementation feedback very welcome //cc @ejose19.
@hemanth the CI can't run at the moment due to the rebase not landing cleanly - can you try squash this down to a single commit without a rebase commit? Then I can retrigger the CI.
|
Thanks @guybedford! But looks like there is a mismatch from the |
|
@hemanth that top commit in your screenshot looks like a merge commit which is likely the issue. |
unflags top-level await for the REPL. This is accomplished by getting rid of `--experimental-repl-await` flag and the checks related to the same.
|
Dang, right. Thanks @guybedford the latest commit should fix it. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Looks like finally everything is green! [Should I re-write the commit message?] Also, made a quick video: await-repl.mov^ Look like GH is not able to play it inline, here is the link. |
Unflags top-level await for the REPL by enabling --experimental-repl-await by default. Opt-out is supported via --no-experimental-repl-await. PR-URL: #34733 Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <[email protected]>
|
Thank you! @guybedford ππ€ΈββοΈ |
|
Is this considered a breaking change or no? I'm wondering in which node version(s) it will release. |
|
@cspotcode strictly speaking this isn't a breaking change, so it would be fine for 16, but for stability reasons it probably is best not to backport. I've added the no backport labels. |
|
@cspotcode yes exactly, glad you found the resoures there. I've just added the semver-minor and notable-change labels as well here. Let me know if you have any concerns or feedback here further. |
|
No feedback, this answers all my questions. Thank you. |
Unflags top-level await for the REPL by enabling --experimental-repl-await by default. Opt-out is supported via --no-experimental-repl-await. PR-URL: #34733 Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <[email protected]>
Notable changes: build: * (SEMVER-MINOR) reset embedder string to "-node.0" (MichaΓ«l Zasso) #39470 deps: * (SEMVER-MINOR) restore minimum ICU version to 68 (MichaΓ«l Zasso) #39470 * (SEMVER-MINOR) make V8 9.2 abi-compatible with 9.0 (MichaΓ«l Zasso) #39470 * (SEMVER-MINOR) update V8 to 9.2.230.21 (MichaΓ«l Zasso) #39470 inspector: * mark as stable (Gireesh Punathil) #37748 perf_hooks: * (SEMVER-MINOR) web performance timeline compliance (legendecas) #39297 punycode: * add pending deprecation (Antoine du Hamel) #38444 repl: * (SEMVER-MINOR) enable --experimental-repl-await /w opt-out (hemanth.hm) #34733 PR-URL: TODO
Unflags top-level await for the REPL by enabling --experimental-repl-await by default. Opt-out is supported via --no-experimental-repl-await. PR-URL: #34733 Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <[email protected]>
This is a security release. Notable Changes: - CVE-2021-22930: Use after free on close http2 on stream canceling (High) [#39423](#39423) - (SEMVER-MINOR) deps: update V8 to 9.2.230.21 (MichaΓ«l Zasso) [#39470](#39470) - inspector: mark as stable (Gireesh Punathil) [#37748](#37748) - (SEMVER-MINOR) perf_hooks: web performance timeline compliance (legendecas) [#39297](#39297) - punycode: add pending deprecation (Antoine du Hamel) [#38444](#38444) - (SEMVER-MINOR) repl: enable --experimental-repl-await /w opt-out (hemanth.hm) [#34733](#34733) PR-URL: #39534
This is a security release. Notable Changes: - CVE-2021-22930: Use after free on close http2 on stream canceling (High) [#39423](#39423) - (SEMVER-MINOR) deps: update V8 to 9.2.230.21 (MichaΓ«l Zasso) [#39470](#39470) - inspector: mark as stable (Gireesh Punathil) [#37748](#37748) - (SEMVER-MINOR) perf_hooks: web performance timeline compliance (legendecas) [#39297](#39297) - punycode: add pending deprecation (Antoine du Hamel) [#38444](#38444) - (SEMVER-MINOR) repl: enable --experimental-repl-await /w opt-out (hemanth.hm) [#34733](#34733) PR-URL: #39534
This is a security release. Notable Changes: - CVE-2021-22930: Use after free on close http2 on stream canceling (High) [#39423](#39423) - (SEMVER-MINOR) deps: update V8 to 9.2.230.21 (MichaΓ«l Zasso) [#39470](#39470) - inspector: mark as stable (Gireesh Punathil) [#37748](#37748) - punycode: add pending deprecation (Antoine du Hamel) [#38444](#38444) - (SEMVER-MINOR) repl: enable --experimental-repl-await /w opt-out (hemanth.hm) [#34733](#34733) PR-URL: #39534
This is a security release. Notable Changes: - CVE-2021-22930: Use after free on close http2 on stream canceling (High) [#39423](#39423) - (SEMVER-MINOR) deps: update V8 to 9.2.230.21 (MichaΓ«l Zasso) [#39470](#39470) - inspector: mark as stable (Gireesh Punathil) [#37748](#37748) - punycode: add pending deprecation (Antoine du Hamel) [#38444](#38444) - (SEMVER-MINOR) repl: enable --experimental-repl-await /w opt-out (hemanth.hm) [#34733](#34733) PR-URL: #39534
|
We're getting issues with this implementation: #39744. Should we revert? It doesn't seem to be ready to be out of experimental just yet. |
|
Given that #39744 only happens if top-level await is used, I think it's fine. |
|
I only considered this PR as unflagging, but not as moving out of experimental. If you think it would be good to add an explicit experimental status to the support of |
|
Thanks for the pointer. Bugs on experimental features are from a process perspective a feature not a bug! |

Now that we have #34558 it makes sense to unflag Top-Level await for the REPL?
This PR is getting rid of
--experimental-repl-awaitflag and the checks related to the same.