@@ -31,25 +31,25 @@ TEST(NodeCrypto, NewRootCertStore) {
3131 */
3232TEST (NodeCrypto, MemoryTrackingConstants) {
3333 // Verify that our memory tracking constants are defined and reasonable
34- EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , 0 )
34+ EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 0 ) )
3535 << " SSL_CTX size constant should be positive" ;
36- EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , 0 )
36+ EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , static_cast < size_t >( 0 ) )
3737 << " X509 size constant should be positive" ;
38- EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , 0 )
38+ EXPECT_GT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 0 ) )
3939 << " EVP_MD_CTX size constant should be positive" ;
4040
4141 // Verify reasonable size ranges (basic sanity check)
42- EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , 10000 )
42+ EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 10000 ) )
4343 << " SSL_CTX size should be reasonable" ;
44- EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , 10000 )
44+ EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , static_cast < size_t >( 10000 ) )
4545 << " X509 size should be reasonable" ;
46- EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , 1000 )
46+ EXPECT_LT (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 1000 ) )
4747 << " EVP_MD_CTX size should be reasonable" ;
4848
4949 // Specific values we expect based on our implementation
50- EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , 240 );
51- EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , 128 );
52- EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , 48 );
50+ EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_SSL_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 240 ) );
51+ EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_X509 , static_cast < size_t >( 128 ) );
52+ EXPECT_EQ (node::crypto::kSizeOf_EVP_MD_CTX , static_cast < size_t >( 48 ) );
5353}
5454
5555TEST (NodeCrypto, TryGetIntCipherOutputLength) {
0 commit comments