I have noticed that, if you run the uncompressed source through Packer with both Base62 and shrinking enabled, you get a 100k file - a significant improvement over the current 160k minified version you guys provide. Perhaps you guys could benefit from integrating Packer into your workflow instead of whatever you're using at the moment? :)
I have noticed that, if you run the uncompressed source through Packer with both Base62 and shrinking enabled, you get a 100k file - a significant improvement over the current 160k minified version you guys provide. Perhaps you guys could benefit from integrating Packer into your workflow instead of whatever you're using at the moment? :)