chore: Update dependency cspell to v10.1.1 - #531

feat(cspell-junit-reporter): add JUnit XML reporter package (#​8945)

Closes #​4570.

Adds @cspell/cspell-junit-reporter, a new workspace package modeled on packages/cspell-json-reporter, that emits a JUnit-compatible XML report of a cspell run.

The issue asked for a minimal mapping along the lines of:

<testsuite tests="3">
  <testcase classname="File1" name"/>
  <testcase classname="File2" name="AnotherSuccessfulTest"/>
  <testcase classname="foo3" name="AFailingTest">
    <failure type="prohibited word"> zzz </failure>
  </testcase>
</testsuite>

This PR follows that shape but wraps it in a <testsuites> root and groups by file (one <testsuite> per file, suite name = file path), since that is the convention used by other widely-consumed JUnit reporters (for example ESLint's JUnit formatter) and is what most CI JUnit parsers expect. The package README documents the full mapping.

• package.json, tsconfig.json, test framework, and files/exports/publishConfig shape are copied from cspell-json-reporter. Version pinned to 10.0.1 to match the monorepo's locked versioning.
• No third-party XML library was added. The repo has no existing XML dependency, so a small escaping helper (src/utils/escapeXml.ts) and a pure XML-string builder (src/utils/buildJUnitXml.ts) were written in-repo, consistent with the monorepo's small-utility-file convention.
• Unit tests (32) cover: no files, a clean file (single passing testcase), a file with issues, escaping of special characters in paths/words/messages, a skipped file, and non-issue processing errors (error emitter routed to a dedicated cspell-errors testsuite using <error>).

Assumptions the issue thread left ambiguous, called out for review:

1. One <testsuite> per file rather than one flat suite for the whole run. Matches common JUnit reporter convention and keeps per-file counts meaningful in CI UIs.
2. A clean file gets one synthetic passing <testcase name="no issues found"> so a suite is never reported with tests="0", which some JUnit consumers treat as suspicious.
3. Settings are intentionally slimmer than cspell-json-reporter's (outFile, suiteName only). JUnit XML has no natural place for arbitrary debug/progress log dumps.
4. cspell processing errors are reported as <error> elements, distinct from spelling <failure> elements, per the JUnit failure-vs-error distinction.

Verified locally: tsc -b clean, vitest 32/32, eslint and prettier clean, and the full monorepo build:prod succeeds with the package in the workspace. One environment note: the package's CLI smoke-test script wasn't runnable locally (repo requires Node >=22.18.0, local was 22.17.0 — the sibling json-reporter fails identically there), so CI is the first place it will run.

fix: allow substitutions across ignored ranges (#​9017)