Conversation
|
|
What are the asv results? FYI You can't run anything else while running that benchmark. |
adam2392
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some suggestions and minor clean up. Please run the asv benchmark for RF and post the results here when you are done w/ the cleanup. Remember to not run anything in the background while the asv is running to not confound the results.
Add our names and emails to the top few lines of .pyx file. E.g. where
# Jacob Schreiber <[email protected]>
# Nelson Liu <[email protected]>
#
is in the same format to address credit for making changes.
|
You don't need to post the output of the tests: #27 (comment) The unit-tests are ran via the CI jobs. What you do need to show is the asv benchmark, since that is not run until PRs are merged into main. |
@adam2392 do they look okay? I didn't run |
|
You can compare the two like done in scikit-learn#24678 (comment) Maybe check https://asv.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference.html to see how you can use their CLI tools to directly compare the two results you have? Or some plot. Skimming the numbers they look okay tho. But for Julien and sklearn reviewers, best to have it in an easier format to read. |
Co-authored-by: Adam Li <[email protected]>
|
Here is the comparison from asv CLI, though, I realized that the |
|
Sweet! Nah that looks good. Basically means no regressions in performance as expected. |
|
Can you copy the asv results over to the main PR and information about your testing machine? |
Reference Issues/PRs
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Any other comments?