AdaptivePoolingAllocator: call unreserveMatchingBuddy(...) if byteBuf initialization failed#16327
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…ck, if buf initialization failed in BuddyChunk, to reuse memory
chrisvest
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2026
netty-project-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2026
…Buf` initialization failed (#16327) Motivation: In `BuddyChunk.readInitInto(...)`, we should call `unreserveMatchingBuddy(...)` if the `byteBuf` initialization failed, to unreserve the memory. Modification: Call `unreserveMatchingBuddy(...)` in the `finally` block. Result: Better memory utilization. Co-authored-by: lao <none> (cherry picked from commit 2e93f84)
Contributor
|
Auto-port PR for 4.1: #16331 |
Contributor
|
Auto-port PR for 5.0: #16332 |
netty-project-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2026
…Buf` initialization failed (#16327) Motivation: In `BuddyChunk.readInitInto(...)`, we should call `unreserveMatchingBuddy(...)` if the `byteBuf` initialization failed, to unreserve the memory. Modification: Call `unreserveMatchingBuddy(...)` in the `finally` block. Result: Better memory utilization. Co-authored-by: lao <none> (cherry picked from commit 2e93f84)
chrisvest
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2026
…(...)` if `byteBuf` initialization failed (#16332) Auto-port of #16327 to 5.0 Cherry-picked commit: 2e93f84 --- Motivation: In `BuddyChunk.readInitInto(...)`, we should call `unreserveMatchingBuddy(...)` if the `byteBuf` initialization failed, to unreserve the memory. Modification: Call `unreserveMatchingBuddy(...)` in the `finally` block. Result: Better memory utilization. Co-authored-by: old driver <[email protected]>
chrisvest
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2026
…(...)` if `byteBuf` initialization failed (#16331) Auto-port of #16327 to 4.1 Cherry-picked commit: 2e93f84 --- Motivation: In `BuddyChunk.readInitInto(...)`, we should call `unreserveMatchingBuddy(...)` if the `byteBuf` initialization failed, to unreserve the memory. Modification: Call `unreserveMatchingBuddy(...)` in the `finally` block. Result: Better memory utilization. Co-authored-by: old driver <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation:
In
BuddyChunk.readInitInto(...), we should callunreserveMatchingBuddy(...)if thebyteBufinitialization failed, to unreserve the memory.Modification:
Call
unreserveMatchingBuddy(...)in thefinallyblock.Result:
Better memory utilization.