Skip to content

Fix typo in warning message for read-only mode#1317

Merged
jokob-sk merged 1 commit intonetalertx:mainfrom
mmomjian:main
Nov 29, 2025
Merged

Fix typo in warning message for read-only mode#1317
jokob-sk merged 1 commit intonetalertx:mainfrom
mmomjian:main

Conversation

@mmomjian
Copy link
Contributor

@mmomjian mmomjian commented Nov 29, 2025

https://docs.docker.com/reference/compose-file/services/#read_only

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected guidance text in filesystem warning message to reflect accurate configuration format.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2025

Walkthrough

A guidance text string in the appliance integrity entrypoint script was updated to correct the YAML property name format from kebab-case to snake_case in the read-only filesystem warning message.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Production filesystem entrypoint guidance correction
install/production-filesystem/entrypoint.d/95-appliance-integrity.sh
Updated guidance text in read-only filesystem warning from "use read-only: true" to "use read_only: true" to match correct YAML property naming convention

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Single-line string change with no logic impact or control flow modifications

Poem

🐰 A typo in the guidance, oh what a sight,
Kebab to snake, now the format's right!
One little change, a dash becomes an underscore,
The appliance hums happily, clarity restored! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: fixing a typo in a read-only mode warning message from 'read-only' to 'read_only'.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ba34817 and 59b4177.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • install/production-filesystem/entrypoint.d/95-appliance-integrity.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-09-20T14:09:29.159Z
Learnt from: adamoutler
Repo: jokob-sk/NetAlertX PR: 1184
File: .devcontainer/scripts/setup.sh:103-116
Timestamp: 2025-09-20T14:09:29.159Z
Learning: In NetAlertX devcontainer setup, the netalertx user has write permissions to /var/log/nginx/ directory as it's explicitly chowned to netalertx:www-data in the Dockerfile, so setup.sh can write to nginx log files without sudo.

Applied to files:

  • install/production-filesystem/entrypoint.d/95-appliance-integrity.sh
📚 Learning: 2025-10-26T17:09:18.621Z
Learnt from: adamoutler
Repo: jokob-sk/NetAlertX PR: 1235
File: .devcontainer/scripts/setup.sh:146-148
Timestamp: 2025-10-26T17:09:18.621Z
Learning: In `.devcontainer/scripts/setup.sh` and other devcontainer setup scripts for NetAlertX, chmod 666 on /var/run/docker.sock is acceptable because devcontainer environments are single-user development contexts where convenience can take priority over strict permission hardening.

Applied to files:

  • install/production-filesystem/entrypoint.d/95-appliance-integrity.sh
🔇 Additional comments (1)
install/production-filesystem/entrypoint.d/95-appliance-integrity.sh (1)

17-17: Good catch on the Docker Compose syntax.

The change correctly aligns the user-facing guidance with Docker Compose's actual YAML property naming. The correct syntax is read_only: true (snake_case) as documented in the Docker Compose specification, not read-only: true (kebab-case).

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jokob-sk
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @mmomjian 🙏

@jokob-sk jokob-sk merged commit 21a4d20 into netalertx:main Nov 29, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants