Skip to content

docs: ai-memory --capture-assistant was not in force on this host (correction #149) - #997

Merged
seathatflowsinourveins merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
claude/ns2604-memdocs-149-20261011
Oct 12, 2026
Merged

seathatflowsinourveins merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
claude/ns2604-memdocs-149-20261011

Conversation

@seathatflowsinourveins

@seathatflowsinourveins seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Scope

  • Correction Record the regular-session no-signal run and the first extended-hours paper run #149 in docs/memory-landscape-maintenance.md: the documented --capture-assistant opt-in was not in force on this host (0 of 9 Claude and 0 of 7 Codex hook commands carried it on 2026-10-11; the 0 of 7 is the native Codex profile's and the Desktop profile's seven were not measured; the counts, the Claude re-stage and the pending Codex trust are CC host measurements, recorded as correction Record the regular-session no-signal run and the first extended-hours paper run #149 in coordination/lessons-20261005/cc-corrections-20261005.md, not re-read by this lane). Claude was re-staged with it on 2026-10-11 and only its Stop hook carries the flag; native Codex is pending a trust refresh. Follow-ups from the docs: ai-memory allowlist capture was not in force on this host (correction #144) #988 read: the HookArgs v2.6.3 range in the doc-contract test is :2961-2970, test 1 checks every --check-capture sh block, and the read kit's "repositories commit the marker" comment is recorded as a host note against .gitignore:73 (the kit lives in the co-op's host state directory, not this repository).
  • Review-thread fixes (one commit, 8b8c8f54): the 2026-09-21 qualification prose after the correction is dated and points at correction Record the regular-session no-signal run and the first extended-hours paper run #149; the host state is labelled as CC measurements; the cites are pinned to ai-memory v2.6.3 = 385b81ea; the Codex trust-hash mechanism is corrected to the computed current hash versus the stored trusted_hash.
  • Locator correction (one commit, 03fc660b, CC correction Document interim foundation/trading lane ownership (docs/lanes.md) #180): the ledger sits at coordination/lessons-20261005/cc-corrections-20261005.md (state-root relative, host state), not under command-center/. The doc text and the test pin take the true form, and the test rejects the old one.
  • Terminal fix (one commit, 07f373ec; the CC's adjudication of the three Codex threads on 03fc660b): the installer lead at docs/memory-landscape-maintenance.md:111-118 is dated and cites the retained 2026-09-21 record (native-commands.json:295-393: the three installers ran with --capture-assistant, exit 0 each); correction Record the regular-session no-signal run and the first extended-hours paper run #149 no longer says "the earlier hook applications ran without the flag" (the same record contradicts it), names the two later flagless applications and dates "not in force" to 2026-10-11; its Codex count and Codex conclusions are bounded to the native profile (hook-trust.json: seven hook commands in each of two profiles, native :35-77, Desktop :279-321), and the Desktop profile is stated as not measured.
  • Base commit: 3a8a8461ee60bd499efcb78156ce4c3c052430c5
  • Lane: lane:foundation
  • Owned paths touched: docs/memory-landscape-maintenance.md, tests/test_memory_landscape_capture_doc.py, manifests/evidence.json (re-registered hashes only, in each of the five commits)

Codex threads resolved

Each thread has a reply with the fix line and the commit. The first four are resolved at 8b8c8f54; the three Codex raised on 03fc660b are resolved at 07f373ec (two fixed, one not accepted).

  • 4240862885, contradiction: the prose after the correction (docs/memory-landscape-maintenance.md:136-145 and :147-155) opens "At the 2026-09-21 qualification" and points at correction Record the regular-session no-signal run and the first extended-hours paper run #149; OlderQualificationStatementTests reads it (correction_149_section stopped before it).
  • 4240862887, unverified host state: the counts, the later hook applications, the Claude re-stage and the pending Codex trust are labelled CC host measurements with a repo-safe locator; the hook files were not re-read, the ledger entry was (it matches). The reply quotes the locator as first written; 03fc660b corrects it.
  • 4240862892, pin: the cites are at ai-memory v2.6.3 = 385b81ea and byte-identical at v2.6.0 = 89bd8ded; the test requires both pins beside each cite.
  • 4240862894, trust hash: re-rendering changes the computed current hash, the stored trusted_hash is unchanged, and the /hooks review writes the reviewed hash; cited at Codex rust-v0.162.1 = 092d3acd and in the 2026-10-04 decision record.
  • 4245318057 (P2), the lead still said the installers were run with the flag: reply 4245477987. The retained 2026-09-21 record (native-commands.json:295-393) shows they were, exit 0 each, so the lead was true but undated; the sentence it contradicted was correction Record the regular-session no-signal run and the first extended-hours paper run #149's undated "The earlier hook applications ran without the flag". The lead opens "At the 2026-09-21 qualification", cites the record and says it is not the hook state now (:111-118); Record the regular-session no-signal run and the first extended-hours paper run #149 (:134) says the qualification's installers carried the flag, the flag was lost before the 2026-10-11 measurement, the loss path is host history not reconstructed here, and two later applications (the Make verdict-review-gate apply the landscape validator's withheld-key policy #144 repair, the 2.6.3 re-stage of 2026-10-10) ran without it. The reading of the lead as a false claim is corrected by this artifact; the lead was not rewritten to say flagless. Two InstallerLeadTests tests fail on 03fc660b (the third guards the artifact and passes either way).
  • 4245318059 (P2), the second Codex profile: reply 4245478146. hook-trust.json lists seven hook commands per profile, native :35-77 and Desktop :279-321 (14 in all), so the CC's 0 of 7 is one profile's. Record the regular-session no-signal run and the first extended-hours paper run #149 states the 0 of 7 as the native profile's, says the Desktop profile's seven were not measured (no claim about their flag or trust state) and bounds its Codex conclusions to the native profile; the qualification prose after the corrections (:153-155) does the same. CodexProfileScopeTests (2 tests) and one OlderQualificationStatementTests test fail on 03fc660b.
  • 4245318064 (P1), record layer resolution before upstream research: not accepted, reply 4245478240, resolved as not applicable. The layer-resolution protocol (W6 governance: preserve survivors and resolve layers before research #1008) governs layer adoption and verdict decisions; this PR changes no layer verdict and is a correction of a host-state claim under AGENTS.md "Corrections", satisfied by the pinned upstream sources (ai-memory v2.6.3 = 385b81ea, Codex rust-v0.162.1 = 092d3acd) and the fail-before tests.

SOTA sources

  • ai-memory v2.6.3 = 385b81ea95f7b73ede7146d0ae606c4caa7b43c1 (akitaonrails/ai-memory; the tag peels to this commit on the upstream remote and ai-memory --version on the host prints 2.6.3), read from the pinned local upstream mirror: crates/ai-memory-cli/src/commands/install_hooks.rs:689-701 (an existing opt-in is preserved on a bare re-apply, never added), :1104-1109 (existing_capture_assistant_opt_in) and :1142 (baked_capture_assistant scans the installed ai-memory commands for the flag); crates/ai-memory-cli/src/commands/render_shared.rs:1425-1427 (flag baked only when event == "stop"); crates/ai-memory-cli/src/cli.rs:2961-2970 (HookArgs, required --event, --agent, --server-url).
  • ai-memory v2.6.0 = 89bd8ded3c1ab8b769cf99417d038ed0364403c8: the same install_hooks.rs and render_shared.rs ranges are byte-identical at the same lines (install_hooks.rs 660-705 and 1100-1150, render_shared.rs 1385-1432, diffed between the mirrors; the first differing hunks are install_hooks.rs:4316 and render_shared.rs:2179, plus same-count replacements at render_shared.rs:336 and :341); crates/ai-memory-cli/src/cli.rs:2957-2966 (HookArgs).
  • openai/codex rust-v0.162.1 = 092d3acd6bec3e3a14bdc7e7a2810ab628ab759d (the tag peels to this commit on the upstream remote; the installed codex-cli is 0.162.1), read from the pinned local upstream mirror: codex-rs/hooks/src/engine/discovery.rs:796-813 (hook_trust_status: a stored hash that differs from the current hash is Modified), :777-794 (hook_hash) and :715-721 (a hook runs only when Managed or Trusted unless bypass_hook_trust); codex-rs/tui/src/hooks_rpc.rs:58-92 (write_hook_trusts writes trusted_hash = the reviewed current hash). First-party: docs/decisions/2026-10-04-codex-rtk-hook-qualified.md Decision 1 states the same mechanism at rust-v0.159.3.
  • First-party artifacts at 03fc660b (unchanged by this PR; the new tests re-derive every cited line range from the files): evidence/artifacts/memory-landscape-20260921/native-commands.json:295-393 (hook-install-claude :295, hook-install-codex :328, hook-install-desktop :361, each with --capture-assistant in argv and exit_code 0) and evidence/artifacts/memory-landscape-20260921/hook-trust.json:35-77 and :279-321 (seven hook commands for each of the native and Desktop profiles, the Stop command modified before the review and trusted after, in both).
  • Not authenticated by this lane: the host hook counts and the Claude re-stage (hook settings files are out of bounds). Both are the CC's measurements, recorded as correction Record the regular-session no-signal run and the first extended-hours paper run #149 in coordination/lessons-20261005/cc-corrections-20261005.md; that entry was read and matches the doc. The entry gives "0 of 7 Codex" without naming a hooks.json; the native scope is the CC's option in its adjudication, and the Desktop profile's flag and trust state stay unclaimed.

Evidence-class table

Claim Evidence class Command / receipt
Cited upstream lines say what the correction states source_review read in the v2.6.3 and v2.6.0 ai-memory mirrors and the rust-v0.162.1 Codex mirror; the tags confirmed with git ls-remote
The locator names the ledger's real place source_review the ledger file located by name under the host state root; CC correction #180 confirms it
Doc-contract tests fail on 805aca0's text and on 8b8c8f54's locator, and pass after the edits local_integration below
Host hook counts, Claude re-stage, Codex trust pending source_review CC ledger entry for correction #149; the hook files were not re-measured here
The 2026-09-21 installers ran with the flag, exit 0 source_review native-commands.json:295-393 at 03fc660b, read directly and re-checked by test_the_cited_installer_record_carries_the_flag_and_exit_zero
Seven hook commands in each Codex profile source_review hook-trust.json:35-77 and :279-321 at 03fc660b, counted by CodexProfileScopeTests
Doc-contract tests fail on 03fc660b's text and pass on 07f373ec local_integration below

Local commands run

$ python3 -E -s -B tests/test_memory_landscape_capture_doc.py -v   (final tests, doc text of 805aca01)
Ran 10 tests ... FAILED (failures=4)   # one per thread, 0 errors
$ python3 -E -s -B tests/test_memory_landscape_capture_doc.py -v   (locator pin, doc text of 8b8c8f54)
Ran 10 tests ... FAILED (failures=1)   # the true-locator pin, 0 errors
$ python3 -E -s -B tests/test_memory_landscape_capture_doc.py -v   (at 03fc660b)
Ran 10 tests ... OK
$ python3 -E -s -B scripts/validate.py
exit 0 (status passed, 70 components, 239 receipts, 11703 hashed files)
$ python3 -E -s -B scripts/evidence_manifest.py --check
exit 0 ({"files": 11703, "status": "passed"})
$ gitleaks git --log-opts="3a8a8461..03fc660b"
4 commits scanned, no leaks found
$ python3 -E -s -B tests/test_memory_landscape_capture_doc.py -v   (committed test file, doc text of 03fc660b)
Ran 16 tests ... FAILED (failures=5)   # 11 OK, 0 errors, rc 1; the five are the new regressions
$ python3 -E -s -B tests/test_memory_landscape_capture_doc.py -v   (at 07f373ec)
Ran 16 tests ... OK   # rc 0
$ python3 scripts/validate.py   (without -I)
exit 0 ({"components": 70, "hashed_files": 11703, "profiles": 4, "receipts": 239, "status": "passed"})
$ python3 scripts/evidence_manifest.py --check   (without -I)
exit 0 ({"files": 11703, "status": "passed"})
$ gitleaks git --log-opts="3a8a8461..07f373ec" --config .gitleaks.toml
5 commits scanned, no leaks found (rc 0)
$ git merge-tree --write-tree origin/main 07f373ec   (origin/main 2c4fdf86, 7 commits ahead of the base)
rc 0, clean (tree feecf72b); no rebase, so the push was the fast-forward 03fc660b..07f373ec
pre-push gate (host-name scan, three registry tests, published-digest guard): passed
privacy scan of the diff, commit message, thread replies and this body (names_checked=3): 0 hits, positive control ok

Decision record

None; a documentation correction with a regression test.

Host evidence

Not applicable (no evidence/hosts/ change).

Follow-ups

  • Open, host side and outside this PR: the Desktop profile's seven Codex hook commands (hook-trust.json:279-321) were not measured on 2026-10-11, so their flag and trust state are unclaimed; measuring them, and re-staging with the trust refresh if they lack the flag, is a CC host action. Three notes are recorded here so they are not lost:
    • The lead and the retained record: the installers did run with --capture-assistant on 2026-09-21 (native-commands.json:295-393). The doc now says that, dates it, and no longer says the earlier hook applications ran without the flag; how the flag was lost by 2026-10-11 is host history not reconstructed here.
    • The message of 8b8c8f54 says every artifact under evidence/artifacts/memory-landscape-20260921/ carries 2026-09-21. Precisely, four run artifacts carry 2026-09-21 timestamps (hook-trust.json, native-client-results.json, native-commands.json, state-observation.json), sources.json carries it among older upstream dates, and qualification.json carries no date. The doc claims only the date of the qualification prose.
    • The CC ledger entry for correction Record the regular-session no-signal run and the first extended-hours paper run #149 carried a loose trusted_hash sentence, and the brief gave a locator that did not resolve. The CC recorded both as its correction Document interim foundation/trading lane ownership (docs/lanes.md) #180; this PR takes the true locator in 03fc660b and states the trust mechanism as the decision record does.

Checklist

  • No workflow changes.
  • No secrets printed, logged or committed.
  • No new paid surface.
  • Peer-owned files and worktrees preserved.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Follow-ups after landing (CC, 2026-10-12T08:53:46Z)

The final reads' P3s, carried here because the landing did not move the head:

  • GPT family (fix3 at 07f373ec): the carried unittest diagnostic citation is still missing; keep ordinary Stop rendering distinct from recovery after manual config edits; inherited hostname labels; the cited captures are absent from extra/; gaps in the merged-verification environment.
  • Claude family (micro at 07f373ec): the body says the tests "re-derive every cited line range", but correction Record the regular-session no-signal run and the first extended-hours paper run #149's repeat of 295-393 is a literal; "0 of 9 / 0 of 7 hook commands" counts ai-memory commands only (the live totals are 30 and 14); mutants M14 and M15 survive and M4 and M7 are carried; the kit quote is carried.

@seathatflowsinourveins seathatflowsinourveins added the lane:foundation Foundation lane: Claude/Codex setup, hosts, memory, RAG, research, workers label Oct 11, 2026
@seathatflowsinourveins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-12T07:55:07.265307Z 07f373e Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 805aca0164

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/memory-landscape-maintenance.md Resolved
Comment thread docs/memory-landscape-maintenance.md Resolved
Comment thread docs/memory-landscape-maintenance.md Resolved
@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2026 02:42
…rrection #149)

The maintenance doc said the allowlist installers carried --capture-assistant. 0 of 9 Claude and
0 of 7 Codex hook commands did: ai-memory bakes the flag only into the Stop command and only
preserves an opt-in already present (install_hooks.rs:689-701, 1104-1109 @ 89bd8ded;
render_shared.rs:1425-1427), so applications without the flag never added it. Claude was
re-staged with it on 2026-10-11; Codex waits for a trust refresh (trusted_hash changes).

Also: the HookArgs v2.6.3 range in the doc-contract test becomes :2961-2970, test 1 checks every
--check-capture block, a new test fails on the previous text, and the read kit's "repositories
commit the marker" comment is listed as a host note against .gitignore:73.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>
section_from() used str.index, so a document lacking the #149 heading (the 16f0a1f text) gave
3 test errors instead of contract failures. It now raises AssertionError naming the heading, and the
first #149 test no longer asserts on the whole document before extracting the section: the module
gives 6 OK on the head text and 4 assertion failures, 0 errors, on the 16f0a1f text.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>
…d pin it to the installed releases

Fixes the four Codex review threads on #997 (each verified valid at 805aca0):

1. Contradiction. The two paragraphs after the correction said, in the present tense, that both
   clients' assistant Stop excerpts are opted in and that Codex trust ended in a captured outcome.
   They now open "At the 2026-09-21 qualification" (git blame 54896e7 and every artifact under
   evidence/artifacts/memory-landscape-20260921 carry that date) and point at correction #149. A
   new test reads that prose, which correction_149_section stops before.
2. Unverified host state. The 0 of 9 and 0 of 7 counts, the earlier hook applications, the Claude
   re-stage and the pending Codex trust are labelled CC host measurements, cited to correction #149
   in command-center/lessons-20261005/cc-corrections-20261005.md and "not re-read by this change".
3. Pin. The host runs ai-memory 2.6.3 (385b81ea). install_hooks.rs:689-701, :1104-1109 and :1142
   and render_shared.rs:1425-1427 are byte-identical at the same lines in v2.6.3 and v2.6.0
   (89bd8ded), so both pins are cited and the test requires the v2.6.3 pin beside each cite.
4. Trust hash. Re-rendering changes the computed current hash; the stored trusted_hash is
   unchanged, the mismatch marks the hook modified, and the /hooks review writes the reviewed hash
   into trusted_hash (docs/decisions/2026-10-04-codex-rtk-hook-qualified.md Decision 1 at
   rust-v0.159.3; re-read at rust-v0.162.1 = 092d3acd, the installed codex-cli: discovery.rs:796-813
   and :715-721, hooks_rpc.rs:58-92). The test rejects "re-rendering changes ... trusted_hash".

tests/test_memory_landscape_capture_doc.py now has 10 tests: on the 805aca0 doc text the module
gives 6 OK and 4 assertion failures, 0 errors (one per thread); on this text 10 OK.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>
@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins force-pushed the claude/ns2604-memdocs-149-20261011 branch from 805aca0 to 8b8c8f5 Compare October 12, 2026 03:17
…/lessons-20261005/...

The #149 correction named the CC's ledger as command-center/lessons-20261005/cc-corrections-20261005.md, the
form the brief prescribed. The CC recorded that as its correction #180: the ledger sits at
coordination/lessons-20261005/cc-corrections-20261005.md (state-root relative), a sibling of command-center/,
not under it. The doc keeps "(host state, not in this repository)"; the test now pins the true locator and
rejects the old form. Found by looking up the file name under the host state root; the CC confirmed it in #180.

Fail-before: with the new pin the module gives 9 OK and 1 assertion failure, 0 errors, on the 8b8c8f5 doc
text; 10 OK after. validate.py and evidence_manifest.py --check pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>
@seathatflowsinourveins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 03fc660bcc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/memory-landscape-maintenance.md Resolved
Comment thread docs/memory-landscape-maintenance.md Resolved
Comment thread docs/memory-landscape-maintenance.md Resolved
… to the native profile

Fixes the two upheld Codex threads on #997 at 03fc660 (4245318057, 4245318059). The third,
4245318064 (P1, layer-resolution record), is not accepted: the layer-resolution protocol (#1008)
governs layer adoption and verdict decisions, and this change adds no layer verdict. It corrects a
host-state claim under AGENTS.md "Corrections", which the pinned sources already cited (ai-memory
v2.6.3 = 385b81ea, Codex rust-v0.162.1 = 092d3acd) and the fail-before tests below satisfy.

1. The installer lead (4245318057). The retained 2026-09-21 record,
   evidence/artifacts/memory-landscape-20260921/native-commands.json:295-393 at 03fc660, shows the
   three installers run with --capture-assistant, exit 0 each, so the lead was true but undated; what
   it contradicted was correction #149's undated "The earlier hook applications ran without the
   flag". The lead now opens "At the 2026-09-21 qualification", cites that record and says it is not
   the hook state now. Correction #149 says the qualification's installers carried the flag, so the
   flag was lost before the 2026-10-11 measurement (the loss path is host history not reconstructed
   here), and names the two later flagless applications, the #144 repair and the 2.6.3 re-stage of
   2026-10-10. "Not in force" is dated 2026-10-11.
2. The second Codex profile (4245318059). hook-trust.json at 03fc660 lists seven hook commands for
   the native profile (:35-77) and seven for the Desktop profile (:279-321), 14 in all, so the CC's
   0 of 7 is one profile's. Correction #149 and the qualification prose after it now bound the count
   and the Codex conclusions (trust pending, capture off) to the native profile and say the Desktop
   profile was not measured.

tests/test_memory_landscape_capture_doc.py has 16 tests (10 kept, 6 new). On the 03fc660 doc text
the module gives 11 OK and 5 failures, 0 errors; on this text 16 OK. The new tests read the
artifacts: the line ranges the doc cites, the flag and exit code of the three installer records, and
seven commands per profile. manifests/evidence.json: hashes of the doc and the test re-registered
only.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>
@seathatflowsinourveins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

Reviewed commit: 07f373ecf1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins merged commit bb945f1 into main Oct 12, 2026
37 checks passed
@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins deleted the claude/ns2604-memdocs-149-20261011 branch October 12, 2026 08:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lane:foundation Foundation lane: Claude/Codex setup, hosts, memory, RAG, research, workers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant