Require upstream citations and failing regressions for corrections - #944

…ith tests

Unset workflow agents do not inherit the session model. The workflows page
(Cost section) and the sub-agents page (Choose a model), read 2026-10-11
against Claude Code 2.1.296, resolve a workflow agent's model as a model the
script names, then the definition, then CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL, then the
session model, and adoption/templates/claude.settings.template.json:27 sets
CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL to opus. The reason of the
CLAUDE_CODE_WORKFLOW_SUBAGENT_MODEL row and the record's workflow-agent bullet
now say so, and the dispositions catalog is re-registered in
manifests/evidence.json. Only that row's reason text changed in the catalog;
keys, dispositions, sources and versions are identical, and the watch's counts
do not read the reason.

The record said this repository's CLAUDE.md (8 lines) imports AGENTS.md (14
lines). AGENTS.md has 25 lines at 8c95a50 (#944 grew it before the rebase), and
a count of a file other PRs edit goes stale in a record that is kept, so the
record now states only the import. It also dated the first watch run "at the PR
base", which every rebase moves; the row now names the original base, a7bb4a5
(main after #941, committed 53 s before the run), as the PR's body recorded it.

Two tests in DispositionCitationTests guard these claims:
- test_unset_workflow_agents_are_not_said_to_inherit_the_session_model
- test_the_record_pins_no_instruction_file_line_count_and_no_relative_base
  (no line count after CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md, no "the PR base", the run row
  names a commit, and CLAUDE.md still imports AGENTS.md through its @AGENTS.md
  line, which keeps the one relationship the record states true).
On the tree of 37b9008 plus the test file, the two fail five sub-assertions
(the row and the record say the agents inherit the session model, the row does
not name CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL, the record pins "(8 lines)", and the record
says "the PR base"); on this commit they pass. tests/test_upstream_surface_watch.py
is re-registered in manifests/evidence.json.

The record called #923 a draft; #923 landed in a30c218, its skill pins
client_version 2.1.295 (reference/slots.json:3), and "Cloud routines" is a
ranked alternative of the scheduled-tasks slot (reference/slots.json:1625). The
record now says so, re-dates its exact-case search of the skill's pages, and adds
the sub-agents and workflows pages read on 2026-10-11, with their body digests,
to its SOTA sources. Its scope sentences and its evidence counts (233 tests with
the two new ones) now name the regression tests.

Not run: a probe of workflow-agent model precedence; the corrected sentences
rest on the documentation, and the tests guard the committed text, not the client.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>

…ith tests

Unset workflow agents do not inherit the session model. The workflows page
(Cost section) and the sub-agents page (Choose a model), read 2026-10-11
against Claude Code 2.1.296, resolve a workflow agent's model as a model the
script names, then the definition, then CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL, then the
session model, and adoption/templates/claude.settings.template.json:27 sets
CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL to opus. The reason of the
CLAUDE_CODE_WORKFLOW_SUBAGENT_MODEL row and the record's workflow-agent bullet
now say so, and the dispositions catalog is re-registered in
manifests/evidence.json. Only that row's reason text changed in the catalog;
keys, dispositions, sources and versions are identical, and the watch's counts
do not read the reason.

The record said this repository's CLAUDE.md (8 lines) imports AGENTS.md (14
lines). AGENTS.md has 25 lines at 8c95a50 (#944 grew it before the rebase), and
a count of a file other PRs edit goes stale in a record that is kept, so the
record now states only the import. It also dated the first watch run "at the PR
base", which every rebase moves; the row now names the original base, a7bb4a5
(main after #941, committed 53 s before the run), as the PR's body recorded it.

Two tests in DispositionCitationTests guard these claims:
- test_unset_workflow_agents_are_not_said_to_inherit_the_session_model
- test_the_record_pins_no_instruction_file_line_count_and_no_relative_base
  (no line count after CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md, no "the PR base", the run row
  names a commit, and CLAUDE.md still imports AGENTS.md through its @AGENTS.md
  line, which keeps the one relationship the record states true).
On the tree of 37b9008 plus the test file, the two fail five sub-assertions
(the row and the record say the agents inherit the session model, the row does
not name CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL, the record pins "(8 lines)", and the record
says "the PR base"); on this commit they pass. tests/test_upstream_surface_watch.py
is re-registered in manifests/evidence.json.

The record called #923 a draft; #923 landed in a30c218, its skill pins
client_version 2.1.295 (reference/slots.json:3), and "Cloud routines" is a
ranked alternative of the scheduled-tasks slot (reference/slots.json:1625). The
record now says so, re-dates its exact-case search of the skill's pages, and adds
the sub-agents and workflows pages read on 2026-10-11, with their body digests,
to its SOTA sources. Its scope sentences and its evidence counts (233 tests with
the two new ones) now name the regression tests.

Not run: a probe of workflow-agent model precedence; the corrected sentences
rest on the documentation, and the tests guard the committed text, not the client.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>

… rust-v0.162.1 (#950)

* Resolve the upstream-surface backlog to Claude Code 2.1.296 and Codex rust-v0.162.1

Disposition the 49 open names plus two the docs do not list yet, re-review the
Claude memory and skills document rows, advance the baseline from 2.1.289 and
rust-v0.160.0, and record the gaps, the page-digest rows not added and the
hand-offs in one decision record. Data only: no code, instruction text,
setting, hook or unit changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>

* Record the command center's rulings on the four open upstream-surface rows

Leave CLAUDE_CODE_WORKFLOW_SUBAGENT_MODEL unset (declined); decline
ultrafast_mode (plan-gated, dropped client-side by the OmniRoute profile);
keep the Codex cyber access programs as owner information only; decline the
model_providers capabilities rows until the currency lane's trial after #943.
Rows, decision record and the re-registered catalog hash change together.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>

* Name an owner for each follow-up and hand-off in the gap-resolution record

The page-URL diffs go to the command center (through the daily watch service it
installs after #943), the changelog-name report to the currency lane, and the
settings-drift inventory to cc-native-practice. The weekly practice pass, the
TeammateIdle gate, the cost-data check and the WebSearch interaction now say who
acts or that nothing is scheduled.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>

* Correct four claims in the gap-resolution record; guard two of them with tests

Unset workflow agents do not inherit the session model. The workflows page
(Cost section) and the sub-agents page (Choose a model), read 2026-10-11
against Claude Code 2.1.296, resolve a workflow agent's model as a model the
script names, then the definition, then CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL, then the
session model, and adoption/templates/claude.settings.template.json:27 sets
CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL to opus. The reason of the
CLAUDE_CODE_WORKFLOW_SUBAGENT_MODEL row and the record's workflow-agent bullet
now say so, and the dispositions catalog is re-registered in
manifests/evidence.json. Only that row's reason text changed in the catalog;
keys, dispositions, sources and versions are identical, and the watch's counts
do not read the reason.

The record said this repository's CLAUDE.md (8 lines) imports AGENTS.md (14
lines). AGENTS.md has 25 lines at 8c95a50 (#944 grew it before the rebase), and
a count of a file other PRs edit goes stale in a record that is kept, so the
record now states only the import. It also dated the first watch run "at the PR
base", which every rebase moves; the row now names the original base, a7bb4a5
(main after #941, committed 53 s before the run), as the PR's body recorded it.

Two tests in DispositionCitationTests guard these claims:
- test_unset_workflow_agents_are_not_said_to_inherit_the_session_model
- test_the_record_pins_no_instruction_file_line_count_and_no_relative_base
  (no line count after CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md, no "the PR base", the run row
  names a commit, and CLAUDE.md still imports AGENTS.md through its @AGENTS.md
  line, which keeps the one relationship the record states true).
On the tree of 37b9008 plus the test file, the two fail five sub-assertions
(the row and the record say the agents inherit the session model, the row does
not name CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL, the record pins "(8 lines)", and the record
says "the PR base"); on this commit they pass. tests/test_upstream_surface_watch.py
is re-registered in manifests/evidence.json.

The record called #923 a draft; #923 landed in a30c218, its skill pins
client_version 2.1.295 (reference/slots.json:3), and "Cloud routines" is a
ranked alternative of the scheduled-tasks slot (reference/slots.json:1625). The
record now says so, re-dates its exact-case search of the skill's pages, and adds
the sub-agents and workflows pages read on 2026-10-11, with their body digests,
to its SOTA sources. Its scope sentences and its evidence counts (233 tests with
the two new ones) now name the regression tests.

Not run: a probe of workflow-agent model precedence; the corrected sentences
rest on the documentation, and the tests guard the committed text, not the client.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>